Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 165747 - xfce-base/xfprint-4.4.0 hard depends on net-print/cups
Summary: xfce-base/xfprint-4.4.0 hard depends on net-print/cups
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 160671
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-07 11:50 UTC by Alexander Zubkov
Modified: 2007-02-07 13:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Zubkov 2007-02-07 11:50:50 UTC
New xfprint hard depends on cups and this is not good, I think. It can be compiled without it. Why not add USE-flag?
Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 11:59:03 UTC
Cups provides both cups and lpr backends to xfprint.
Comment 2 Alexander Zubkov 2007-02-07 12:20:42 UTC
And what if I don't have net-print/cups and don't want to install it?
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 12:21:58 UTC
Then don't use xfprint, easy.
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 12:45:11 UTC
Reopen to dupe.
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 12:45:35 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 160671 ***
Comment 6 Alexander Zubkov 2007-02-07 12:51:21 UTC
> Then don't use xfprint, easy.
Ha-ha. :) But this is not a solution.
xfprint CAN work without cups.
I can disable cups manually in my overlay with each release.
But is it very big problem to add USE-flag so all gentoo users can choose what they want? I thought gentoo is made with flexibility in mind.
It is maintainer choice at all, but I want to here more reasonable reject than "cups is enough" or "don't use". If You have not such - say "I want it that way only. For my personal reasons.", then I'll leave it.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 12:52:27 UTC
I've already reopened the original bug, so kindly keep your ranting directed to /dev/null, ktnxbye.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 160671 ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-07 12:52:41 UTC
Closed.
Comment 9 Alexander Zubkov 2007-02-07 12:58:14 UTC
Excuse for reopening. I was writing a comment while You closed it. Why You so angry with it?
BTW, what is "ktnxbye"? :)
Comment 10 Alexander Zubkov 2007-02-07 13:00:01 UTC
> BTW, what is "ktnxbye"? :)
Forget it, Google helped me. :)