The following ebuilds are found to have broken autotools handling, as they run libtoolize directly (they never should, instead they should call eautoreconf in autotools.eclass, read http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/autofailure.xml for more information): ./dev-java/glib-java/glib-java-0.2.3-r1.ebuild: libtoolize --force --copy || die "libtoolize failed" Please cleanup the ebuilds by asking for stable marking, removing obsolete ebuilds with no relevant keywords, or porting the fixes in newer versions (if presents) to properly handle autotools. Thanks, Diego
Let's get glib-java-0.2.6-r1 stable then... it's not exactly 30 days old but revbump from -r0 didn't change ebuild, just ensured everyone will get a minor change to java-gnome.eclass applied. Last arch please note you are the last so we can punt the old ebuilds.
On second thought, I will rather leave this to Betelgeuse to decide, as I don't understand java-gnome that much and I am not sure whether all 6 parts of it need to go stable together. Sorry for the spam.
Ok requesting stable: Package Version ============================= =================== dev-java/libvte-java 0.12.1-r1 dev-java/libgconf-java 2.12.4-r1 dev-java/libglade-java 2.12.6-r1 dev-java/libgnome-java 2.12.5-r1 dev-java/libgtk-java 2.8.7-r1 dev-java/cairo-java 1.0.5-r1 dev-java/glib-java 0.2.6-r1 dev-java/java-gnome 2.14.3 http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/TestingJavaPackages Nothing uses the libraries atm so the only thing we can do is to test that they emerge ok, of course if you want to write some test code yourself...
on x86: i was able to install dev-java/libvte-java-0.12.1-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/libgconf-java-2.12.4-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/libglade-java-2.12.6-r1 USE="gnome -doc -gcj -source" dev-java/libgnome-java-2.12.5-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/libgtk-java-2.8.7-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/cairo-java-1.0.5-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/glib-java-0.2.6-r1 USE="-doc -gcj -source" dev-java/java-gnome-2.14.3 with collision-protect and test using dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.13 USE="X alsa -doc -examples -jce -nsplugin" dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.10 USE="X alsa doc nsplugin -examples -jce" if i've time i'm gonna try to remerge at least some of these with "doc" to check the second point from http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/TestingJavaPackages.
on x86 the following packages emerge and pass collision test: dev-java/libvte-java-0.12.1-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/libgconf-java-2.12.4-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/libglade-java-2.12.6-r1 USE="doc gnome source -gcj" dev-java/libgnome-java-2.12.5-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/libgtk-java-2.8.7-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/cairo-java-1.0.5-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/glib-java-0.2.6-r1 USE="doc source -gcj" dev-java/java-gnome-2.14.3 I emerged all with Blackdown JDK 1.4.2.03 and Sun JDK 1.5.0.10, but I didn't try to emerge things with gcj as I don't have compiled gcc with it. The docs should all be in the right place. Portage 2.1.1-r2 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r4, 2.6.18.6 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.18.6 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP1800+ Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6 Last Sync: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:00:01 +0000 ccache version 2.4 [enabled] app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present] dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.31 dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r3, 2.4.3-r4 dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5 dev-util/ccache: 2.4-r6 dev-util/confcache: [Not Present] sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.17 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10 sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1-r3 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.14 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.22 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.17-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--nospinner" FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks fixpackages metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict test userfetch userpriv usersandbox" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/gentoo/ http://gentoo.inode.at/" LANG="en_GB.utf8" LINGUAS="en de en_GB" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage/normal" SYNC="rsync://192.168.2.1/gentoo-portage" USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac alsa apache2 berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo cdr cli cracklib crypt cups dbus divx4linux dlloader dri dts dvd dvdr dvdread eds elibc_glibc emboss exif fam ffmpeg firefox fortran gdbm gif gnome gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk hal iconv input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg kde kernel_linux ldap libg++ linguas_de linguas_en linguas_en_GB mad mikmod mmx mmxext mono mp3 mpeg ncurses network nls nptl nptlonly ogg opengl oss pam pcre perl png ppds pppd python qt qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection samba sdl seamonkey session spell spl ssl svg tcpd test tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userland_GNU vcd video_cards_none video_cards_nv vorbis win32codecs xine xinerama xml xorg xprint xv xvid zlib" Unset: CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
x86 stable
Stable on ppc
all stable on amd64
*** Bug 160003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Not really fixed until the actual cleanup :)
These libraries are unsupported by upstream. In particular the versions you are talking about are hideously out of date. These packages should be removed. See Bug #160003 Comment #5 (which isn't really a dup of this, but whatever) AfC
(In reply to comment #11) > These libraries are unsupported by upstream. In particular the versions you are > talking about are hideously out of date. These packages should be removed. See > Bug #160003 Comment #5 (which isn't really a dup of this, but whatever) > > AfC > Yeah we are in the process of removing them.
(In reply to comment #12) > > Yeah we are in the process of removing them. > Nothing in dev-java uses libtoolize directly any more: betelgeuse@pena /usr/portage/dev-java $ grep libtoolize -r . ./rxtx/rxtx-2.1.7.2-r1.ebuild: elibtoolize ./rxtx/rxtx-2.1.7.2.ebuild: elibtoolize
