Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 159311 - net-firewall/firehol-1.250 failed patch
Summary: net-firewall/firehol-1.250 failed patch
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 153858
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Dominik Stadler (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-12-28 14:26 UTC by Carl Michal
Modified: 2006-12-29 01:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carl Michal 2006-12-28 14:26:07 UTC
emerging firehole 1.250 fails when the firehol-1.226-250 patch is applied.

The log in
/var/tmp/portage/firehol-1.250/temp/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch-29243.out 
is:

***** firehol-1.226-to-250.patch *****

======================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/net-fire
wall/firehol/files/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch

======================================
patching file firehol.sh
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 171.
Hunk #43 FAILED at 5415.
Hunk #44 FAILED at 5601.
Hunk #47 FAILED at 5907.
Hunk #48 FAILED at 5990.
6 out of 49 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file firehol.sh.rej
======================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/net-fire
wall/firehol/files/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch

======================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- firehol.new        2006-12-27 14:13:39.000000000 +0100
|+++ firehol.sh 2006-12-27 14:15:57.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
49 out of 49 hunks ignored
======================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/net-fire
wall/firehol/files/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch

======================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- firehol.new        2006-12-27 14:13:39.000000000 +0100
|+++ firehol.sh 2006-12-27 14:15:57.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
49 out of 49 hunks ignored
======================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/net-fire
wall/firehol/files/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch

======================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- firehol.new        2006-12-27 14:13:39.000000000 +0100
|+++ firehol.sh 2006-12-27 14:15:57.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
49 out of 49 hunks ignored
======================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/net-fire
wall/firehol/files/firehol-1.226-to-250.patch

======================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- firehol.new        2006-12-27 14:13:39.000000000 +0100
|+++ firehol.sh 2006-12-27 14:15:57.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
49 out of 49 hunks ignored
Comment 1 Bernard Cafarelli gentoo-dev 2006-12-28 14:56:39 UTC
Preventing the ebuild from using both 1.226-1.228 and 1.226-250 patchsolve some of the "Hunk failed" problems, but not all of them 
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-29 01:58:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 153858 ***