Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 154995 (CVE-2006-5601) - net-misc/xsupplicant "eap_do_notify()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-2006-{5601,5602})
Summary: net-misc/xsupplicant "eap_do_notify()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-200...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2006-5601
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://secunia.com/advisories/22612/
Whiteboard: ~1 [noglsa]
Keywords:
: 153423 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 154994
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-11-13 03:59 UTC by dago
Modified: 2010-10-07 22:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description dago 2006-11-13 03:59:52 UTC
cf secunia webpage + xsupplicant homepage : http://open1x.sourceforge.net/

Solution : version bump to 1.2.8

It is possible to do that by just bumping the 1.2.2 ebuild, altough a new feature (support for TNC) has been introduced in 1.2.6 and would required additionnal changes (cf bugs #154993 & #154994). 

I open 2 bugs for this version because of this (patch first then add feature or leverage this vulnerability to quickly get TNC ;).
Comment 1 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-13 06:43:22 UTC
Mobile please advise and bump as necessary. Is xsupplicant installed suid?

Comment 2 dago 2006-11-13 22:59:43 UTC
No, it is not installed suid.
Comment 3 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-14 00:16:37 UTC
Mobile please advise and mask if that is what is planned for the package.
Comment 4 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-16 06:31:24 UTC
Mobile please advise and mask if that is what is planned for the package.
Comment 5 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-20 22:00:35 UTC
No response from Mobile. I think we should mask this one, comments?
Comment 6 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-20 23:14:39 UTC
*** Bug 153423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-20 23:18:26 UTC
Bah, no fun. It's not even stable on a single arch. Rerating.
Comment 8 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-07 13:41:52 UTC
mobile, please comment on this bug, it has been open for months

the ebuild should either be bumped or masked
Comment 9 Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-07 13:54:44 UTC
masked now. was never stable -> no maskglsa required. setting to enhancement
Comment 10 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-09-08 22:42:21 UTC
Maybe this is a candidate for removal?
Comment 11 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-13 00:40:47 UTC
This ebuild has been masked for over a year. If nobody wants to bumb it, I guess it should be removed from the tree.

There are however two bugs with newer ebuilds attached (bug 154994 and bug 174802).
Comment 12 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-05-26 11:44:42 UTC
xsupplicant-2.2.0 is now in the tree. i'll change the mask and clean up the old ebuilds later.
Comment 13 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-01 08:11:09 UTC
i have restricted the mask to <xsupplicant-2.2.0
Comment 14 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-24 06:12:59 UTC
all affected ebuilds have been removed from the tree.
Comment 15 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-10-07 22:09:15 UTC
There never was a stable version. Closing noglsa.