Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 15259 - gnome-2.2 has some issues with library symlinks, I think.
Summary: gnome-2.2 has some issues with library symlinks, I think.
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-02-07 00:42 UTC by Brandon Low (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-02-15 09:28 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-07 00:42:06 UTC
<lostlogic> hmm... gnome-2.2 doesn't werk right.
<lostlogic> lost lib # find . -iname '*.so' > ~/temp.libs
<lostlogic> lost lib # find . -iname '*.so.0' |grep -v -f ~/temp.libs
<lostlogic> doing that shows why.

And then symlinking all thos .so.0 files to appropriate .so files makes it work
again.
Comment 1 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-07 00:43:23 UTC
Doh there is more to it than that... apparently other libraries don't have the appropriate plain .so symlinks... libxml2.so.2 -> libxml2.so being another one I just added on my box.
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-07 06:19:17 UTC
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1.1M Feb  5 17:24 /usr/lib/libxml2.a
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root          707 Feb  5 17:24 /usr/lib/libxml2.la
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           16 Feb  5 17:24 /usr/lib/libxml2.so -> libxml2.so.2.5.2
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           16 Feb  5 17:24 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 -> libxml2.so.2.5.2
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         912K Feb  5 17:24 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.5.2


looks fine here.
Comment 3 Matt Taylor 2003-02-09 00:41:57 UTC
I had problems with various nautlus librarys missing the links.  Dont remember the exact names now...sorry.
Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-09 06:46:33 UTC
lolo can you please mark this as a portage problem if it is one ?
Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-15 09:28:47 UTC
no more reports, looks like a local problem to me