Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 143662 - xscreensaver-5.00 badly parse a float resource
Summary: xscreensaver-5.00 badly parse a float resource
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Desktop Misc. Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 136763
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-08-12 05:47 UTC by Shogun
Modified: 2007-06-13 20:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch to fix the problem (xscreensaver-5.00-get_float_resource.patch,502 bytes, patch)
2006-08-12 05:47 UTC, Shogun
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Shogun 2006-08-12 05:47:08 UTC
When I try to execute glmatrix, it returns this:

glmatrix: speed must be a float, not 1.0.

so I realized that it badly parses a float option.
I saw the code and I found the problem a fixed it with a patch I attach to this report.
I've already mailed the author of xscreensaver about this...
Bye guys!
 Shogun
Comment 1 Shogun 2006-08-12 05:47:32 UTC
Created attachment 94045 [details, diff]
Patch to fix the problem
Comment 2 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-03 02:52:50 UTC
Fixed in 5.00-r1, thanks.
Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-13 18:53:36 UTC
jwz, we are also applying this for 5.02 and I'm not sure have you been informed about it yet. review & comment would be appericiated.

(trying to keep xscreensaver much upstream as possible)
Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-13 18:55:32 UTC
err, missed the part "I've already mailed the author of xscreensaver about this..."
Comment 5 Jamie Zawinski 2007-06-13 19:01:25 UTC
That patch is definitely not right.

I vaguely recall seeing this report and fixing it elsewhere, but I can't remember what I did.  Does it still happen in 5.02 without that patch?
Comment 6 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-13 20:40:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> That patch is definitely not right.

Figured. I've removed it.

> 
> I vaguely recall seeing this report and fixing it elsewhere, but I can't
> remember what I did.  Does it still happen in 5.02 without that patch?
> 

Couldn't reproduce it with 5.02.

Thanks for your time. Again.