Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 141182 - sys-fs/cryptsetup-luks should not die without a configured kernel
Summary: sys-fs/cryptsetup-luks should not die without a configured kernel
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Benjamin Smee (strerror) (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 157467 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-20 08:42 UTC by Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-12-07 14:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-20 08:42:04 UTC
Quite simply, the package compiles just fine without kernel sources.  Simply removing the linux-info_pkg_setup line from pkg_setup is enough to make this package work properly for release building.  What this does is causes the package to spit out a warning if it cannot determine the kernel information, but it doesn't make it fatal, since it is possible to be building this package in many ways, such as building a LiveCD or GRP set.

Thanks
Comment 1 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-13 14:14:45 UTC
I just hit this bug again during a test-catalyst-run.  Would be great if this will be officially resolved instead of in the release-snapshot only.
Comment 2 Benjamin Smee (strerror) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-18 02:49:31 UTC
commited. Sorry about the delay.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-07 13:21:16 UTC
*** Bug 157467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Igor Korot 2006-12-07 14:23:22 UTC
Hi,
I got this bug when trying to build an ivman (bug 157467).
Then I re-compiled the kernel with a an asking support, and I still got this message pops-up. I think it should not be reported, if the kernel configuration is correct.

Thank you.
Comment 5 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-07 14:26:11 UTC
No, your "bug" is just the opposite. It is the *intended* behavior for it to continue compiling, even if the support is not in the current kernel. This is necessary for building releases. Anyway, it's not changing.
Comment 6 Igor Korot 2006-12-07 14:31:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> No, your "bug" is just the opposite. It is the *intended* behavior for it to
> continue compiling, even if the support is not in the current kernel. This is
> necessary for building releases. Anyway, it's not changing.

Yes, it is the opposite.
But when I turn on this option, re-compiled the kernel, re-booted and tried again, I get the same message. Does this mean that the package does not actually check for that option, and the message is just a warning?