Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 139081 - zaptel and lirc udev rules broken (may be change in udev 094)
Summary: zaptel and lirc udev rules broken (may be change in udev 094)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: voip herd (OBSOLETE)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: udev-meta
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-07-03 13:49 UTC by Alan Jones
Modified: 2006-11-27 07:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alan Jones 2006-07-03 13:49:54 UTC
The zaptel rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/10-zaptel.rules include one a single = after KERNEL.

This needs to be changed to a double equals sign ==.

There are also zaptel rules in 50-udev.rules, but these lack the mode and group settings - though alternatively they could be updated and the other file removed.

The rules for lirc (/etc/udev/rules.d/10-lirc.rules) are also missing the second equals sign.
Comment 1 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-14 00:26:51 UTC
Matthias - there is a bit here related to lirc
Comment 2 Matthias Schwarzott gentoo-dev 2006-07-14 12:54:59 UTC
This is the problem already reported in Bug #138532.

This Bug has already been solved in lirc-0.8.0-r1 and lirc-0.8.0-r3.
Revision lirc-0.8.0-r3 was created explicit for this problem.

As udev-094 is unstable at the moment, do you use lirc-0.8.0-r3 (or at least lirc-0.8.0-r1 ?).
And second: Do you update your conf-files after emerging stuff?
Comment 3 Alan Jones 2006-07-14 15:12:31 UTC
Hi Matthias,

I'm running 0.8.0-r1 - I'm on ~amd64 which is missing from the use flags in 0.8.0-r3

Cheers,

Alan.
Comment 4 Matthias Schwarzott gentoo-dev 2006-07-15 00:46:56 UTC
lirc-0.8.0-r1 existed already and was changed by me to contain a correct udev-rules-file. So reemergeing it should help.
I already filled a bug to let amd64-team (and others) keyword the newer lirc-0.8.0-r3 (Bug #138025) but unfortunately they did not react up to now.
Comment 5 Nathan Sullivan 2006-07-21 06:38:56 UTC
does udev-094 support the == syntax? if so im all for updating 10-zaptel.rules. also, the idea of the zaptel rules in 50-udev.rules these days is pretty pointless IMO, cant see why they shouldnt be scrapped from there...the rules in there are old anyways...
Comment 6 Nathan Sullivan 2006-07-21 18:58:45 UTC
i guess ultimately, right now zaptel is b0rked in ~ since its not compatible with the latest ~ udev...thats more what i meant to say :)
Comment 7 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-27 07:24:26 UTC
Fixed in the latest zaptel revbumps since udev-103 went stable.