Bug 138456 – Assert virtual destructor stubs for media-libs/smpeg-0.4.4-r8

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description hiyuh 2006-06-29 04:33:33 UTC]

The patch will be attached tries to assert virtual destructer stubs
for media-libs/smpeg-0.4.4-r8, just work around the compilation warnigs.
I'm not sure whether this patch is correct.

[Comment 1 hiyuh 2006-06-29 04:34:45 UTC]

Created attachment 90415 [details, diff]
a patch to assert virtual destructor.

[Comment 2 SpanKY 2006-10-06 19:55:52 UTC]

i'd have to ask someone who actually likes coding in C++

[Comment 3 Ciaran McCreesh 2006-10-07 07:41:48 UTC]

It's not unsafe. The destructors probably should be virtual there to avoid resource leaks, although it's possible that the code doesn't use pointers to the base class and thus has no need for them.

[Comment 4 hiyuh 2006-10-09 06:14:18 UTC]

Fix typo

[Comment 5 hiyuh 2006-10-09 06:49:13 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> It's not unsafe. The destructors probably should be virtual there to avoid
> resource leaks, although it's possible that the code doesn't use pointers to
> the base class and thus has no need for them.

Thank ciaranm for reveiwing my stupid patch.
I thought it silence warning like, "'class XXX' has virtual functions
but non-virtual destructor", though.
gcc (probably 4 or later?) so buzz its headers, but it's not treated error ATM.

[Comment 6 SpanKY 2006-11-16 20:16:18 UTC]

hey ryan, feel like merging this in the upstream repo ?

[Comment 7 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) 2010-01-20 01:43:01 UTC]

Any chance of getting this patch into the upstream repo?  Or should I just close this out as WONTFIX?

[Comment 8 hiyuh 2010-01-21 00:54:02 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Any chance of getting this patch into the upstream repo?  Or should I just
> close this out as WONTFIX?

for me, feel free to mark as WONTFIX.