Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 137958 - avidemux 2.1_pre1 fails to compile with gcc 4.x
Summary: avidemux 2.1_pre1 fails to compile with gcc 4.x
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GCC Porting (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Media-video project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 147833 154845 160491 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 150175
Blocks: 117482 158340
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-06-25 11:27 UTC by Matheus Izvekov
Modified: 2007-02-03 13:23 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
fix (avidemux-gcc-5.patch,6.64 KB, patch)
2006-06-25 11:28 UTC, Matheus Izvekov 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matheus Izvekov 2006-06-25 11:27:32 UTC 
attached patch fixes this
Comment 1 Matheus Izvekov 2006-06-25 11:28:17 UTC 
Created attachment 90127 [details, diff]
fix
Comment 2 Florian Engelhardt 2006-06-28 01:17:11 UTC 
Same problem here with gcc 4.1 on an amd64.
The attached patch solved the problem here too.

Maybe we should report this patch to upstream
Comment 3 moesasji 2006-07-04 04:03:05 UTC 
This fix is quite strange.
The majority of changes in the fix are moving functions outside class-scope. 
So an awfull lot of function-calls in the format xx::yy are renamed to yy. 
Bad practice if you ask me as it is likely to introduce difficult to find errors and those restrictions are there for a reason. What is the real "fix" is therefore extremely difficult to figure out. 

I've had no problems compiling avidemux 2.1 with gcc 4.x on ~x86. 
To know what is going on an emerge --info and error-message would be usefull.
Comment 4 Matheus Izvekov 2006-07-04 05:46:45 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> This fix is quite strange.
> The majority of changes in the fix are moving functions outside class-scope. 
> So an awfull lot of function-calls in the format xx::yy are renamed to yy. 
> Bad practice if you ask me as it is likely to introduce difficult to find
> errors and those restrictions are there for a reason. What is the real "fix" is
> therefore extremely difficult to figure out. 
> 
> I've had no problems compiling avidemux 2.1 with gcc 4.x on ~x86. 
> To know what is going on an emerge --info and error-message would be usefull.
> 

No its not strange at all, those are methods not functions, the xx: I removed is the object name the method belongs to. We have to remove it because newer gcc deprecates this.
Comment 5 moesasji 2006-07-04 07:23:13 UTC 
> No its not strange at all, those are methods not functions, the xx: I removed
> is the object name the method belongs to. We have to remove it because newer
> gcc deprecates this.
> 
Good, I did not know that this has been deprecated with GCC 4.1. I stand corrected on misusing functions where I should have said methods. 

I however still don't understand why I don't have the same problems compiling on ~x86.
Comment 6 Matheus Izvekov 2006-07-04 12:35:19 UTC 
I sent this patch upstream, the author said most of those are already fixed there, but gentoo is too much lagged behind.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-17 01:37:25 UTC 
*** Bug 147833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-18 06:21:24 UTC 
*** Bug 154845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-06 16:27:30 UTC 
*** Bug 160491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-03 13:23:49 UTC 
removed from tree, file a new bug if an issue with 2.3.0