Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 136953 - [Tracker] sys-apps/man-pages - missing 'linguas_??' flags in IUSE
Summary: [Tracker] sys-apps/man-pages - missing 'linguas_??' flags in IUSE
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 133327
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Tracker
: 138328 141157 148866 148867 205921 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-16 00:43 UTC by Hanno Böck
Modified: 2008-02-26 21:22 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 00:43:04 UTC
As subject says, gnupg-1.4.3-r1 brings a QA-message, it needs in some way linguas_ru added to IUSE.

If this is the only lang supported, you'd probably just add it, if there are more to come, it should likely look like kde-i18n or similar.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 04:59:57 UTC
Erm, while at it... :P

app-accessibility/festival - all versions
app-accessibility/mbrola-3.0.1h-r{3,4}
app-office/openoffice - all versions
app-office/openoffice-bin - all versions
app-text/acroread-7.0.5-r{2,3}
app-text/bibletime - all versions
app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.3-r1
app-vim/cream - all versions
dev-util/eric - all versions
kde-misc/pwmanager - all versions
net-im/psi - all versions
media-fonts/acroread-asianfonts - all versions
sys-apps/man-pages-2.{32,33}
www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.4
www-client/mozilla-firefox--bin-1.5.0.4
Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 05:13:33 UTC
pwmanager done.
Comment 3 Jon Hood (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 06:07:10 UTC
app-accessibility/mbrola and app-accessibility/festival done

for app-text/bibletime,
IUSE.invalid                   9
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.2.ebuild: linguas_nn_NO
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.2.ebuild: linguas_no
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.2.ebuild: linguas_ua
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.6_beta2.ebuild: linguas_nn_NO
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.6_beta2.ebuild: linguas_no
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.6_beta2.ebuild: linguas_ua
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.3.ebuild: linguas_nn_NO
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.3.ebuild: linguas_no
   app-text/bibletime/bibletime-1.5.3.ebuild: linguas_ua

Do these just need to go into use.local.desc, or is there a different protocol for adding the linguas flags to use.desc?
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-16 13:20:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Do these just need to go into use.local.desc, or is there a different protocol
> for adding the linguas flags to use.desc?

AFAIK, profiles/desc/linguas.desc 

Comment 5 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-20 11:19:54 UTC
While going through profiles/desc/linguas.desc to add a few more LINGUAS entries which we use in OpenOffice.org, I noted that a few entries there seem to be wrong, they are:

be > be_BY
hi > hi_IN
pa > pa_IN
sr > sr_CS
ta > ta_IN

this means, according to unicode.org, there is no be-language just a be_BY, the same with the other ones. As OOo uses all of the correct ones I ask myself what the best way to solve this is here. I guess other ebuilds are using the "wrong" ones, so should I just add "be_BY" next to "be" (with the same description) or should we solve that another way?
Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-28 08:53:25 UTC
*** Bug 138328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-03 05:47:04 UTC
Could someone please comment to my last statement, I really don't know how to handle this situation properly.
Comment 8 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-07 00:47:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Could someone please comment to my last statement, I really don't know how to
> handle this situation properly.
> 

So if nobody wants to comment, I'll go ahead and just add the openoffice-entries besides the old ones, no "clean" solution, but better than nothing, I guess
Comment 9 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-07 12:44:16 UTC
Ok, have added the linugas in question, nothing to do for us here anymore, so removing myself from the cc-list
Comment 10 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-07 14:45:52 UTC
www-client/mozilla-firefox{,-bin}, app-crypt/gnupg and the acroread stuff done.
Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-20 05:38:15 UTC
*** Bug 141157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Sascha Silbe 2006-07-20 14:15:55 UTC
From bug #141157: sys-apps/man-pages
Comment 13 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-06 10:45:47 UTC
What's left:

app-text/bibletime - all versions
app-vim/cream - all versions
dev-util/eric - all versions
net-im/psi - all versions
sys-apps/man-pages - all versions

Comment 14 Joshua Jackson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-30 10:56:59 UTC
Cream should be fixed now thanks to Mark Loeser.
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-23 15:50:35 UTC
*** Bug 148866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-23 15:52:31 UTC
*** Bug 148867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Przemyslaw Maciag (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-25 14:37:22 UTC
Hi!

Psi is fixed in CVS.

Regards,
Przemek
Comment 18 Xake 2006-10-13 16:44:42 UTC
I still don't know what linguas to go with. Some packages has only sv (like gtk+-1.*), some packages has only sv_SE (like firefox has have from time to time). profiles/lang.desc only has sv listed, but still.
Why do not try for a unification here or at least go for a system which does not leave out one or the other of them?
Comment 19 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-19 08:26:11 UTC
What's left:

app-text/bibletime - all versions
dev-util/eric - all versions
sys-apps/man-pages - all versions

Comment 20 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-05 06:11:40 UTC
app-text/bibletime - fixed
Comment 21 jINKs 2007-01-27 12:04:52 UTC
from bug #163835

sys-apps/man - all versions
Comment 22 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-11 14:39:36 UTC
app-portage/esearch
Comment 23 Harald van Dijk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-11 15:14:16 UTC
esearch fixed.
Comment 24 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-22 23:51:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #21)
> sys-apps/man - all versions

Nothing else left.
 

Comment 25 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-11-28 07:32:13 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133327 ***
Comment 26 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-15 09:14:30 UTC
*** Bug 205921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-15 09:24:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #25)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133327 ***

Erm... this actually breaks dependencies for sys-apps/man-pages because the stuff in PDEPEND will get depcleaned. Needs to get fixed.
Comment 28 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-01-15 09:55:26 UTC
i agree, the package manager needs to get fixed

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133327 ***
Comment 29 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-15 11:15:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #28)
> i agree, the package manager needs to get fixed

The package manager is not broken in any way here wrt Comment #27. You are stating dependencies for undeclared USE flags.
Comment 30 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-01-15 11:38:28 UTC
implicit/automatic flags should be handled implicitly/automatically for the package manager.  this is the only long term solution for keeping maintenance burden down.
Comment 31 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-26 19:11:18 UTC
*** Bug 211554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2008-02-26 21:22:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #30)
> implicit/automatic flags should be handled implicitly/automatically for the
> package manager.  this is the only long term solution for keeping maintenance
> burden down.

The meanings of "implicit" and "automatic" in that statement seem kind of vague, and we're going to have to get more specific when it comes to solutions.

By "automatic" I guess you're referring to bug 133327 or something similar?

Flags considered as "implicit" members IUSE in portage-2.1.4:

 * Flags derived from ARCH
 * Flags derived from USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN variables
 * Masked flags, such as those from {,package}use.mask
 * Forced flags, such as those from {,package}use.force
 * build and bootstrap flags used by bootstrap.sh

These flags are exempt from being filtered and they are also exempt from the QA notice that's embedded inside useq().