Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 133478 - libstdc++.la is missing on gcc-4.1.0-r1
Summary: libstdc++.la is missing on gcc-4.1.0-r1
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 73435
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-16 04:43 UTC by Gerte Hoogewerf
Modified: 2006-05-16 07:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gerte Hoogewerf 2006-05-16 04:43:09 UTC
I remarked that there is no libstdc++.la installed when using gcc-4.1.0-r1. I consider this as a bug although a can compile c++ stuff on a fresh system.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-16 04:50:31 UTC
fix_libtool_files.sh `gcc -dumpversion`



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 73435 ***
Comment 2 Gerte Hoogewerf 2006-05-16 05:47:20 UTC
I remarked that there is NO libstdc++.la installed when using gcc-4.1.0-r1.
So, it's not there! It's not in the wrong position, it simply does not exist.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-16 05:54:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I remarked that there is NO libstdc++.la installed when using gcc-4.1.0-r1.
> So, it's not there! It's not in the wrong position, it simply does not exist.

Yes, that's intentional...

14 May 2006; Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org> -gcc-4.1.0.ebuild,
+gcc-4.1.0-r1.ebuild, -gcc-4.2.0_alpha20060506.ebuild,
+gcc-4.2.0_alpha20060513.ebuild:
Bump gcc-4.1 so everyone gets the newest changes (no more libstdc++.la and
the 1.4 patchset), and bump the 4.2 weekly snapshot
Comment 4 Gerte Hoogewerf 2006-05-16 07:19:50 UTC
Ok. Sorry for bugging. Thnx for fixing. 
No more libstdc++.la (in paths that will change after every new gcc version) solves more problems than the amount created right now :)

This seems the better solution in the long run.
Thnx.