Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 127317 - Shift-insert broken with release of x11-libs/vte 0.11.18
Summary: Shift-insert broken with release of x11-libs/vte 0.11.18
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 119872
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-03-23 08:08 UTC by Owen Berry
Modified: 2006-10-11 20:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Owen Berry 2006-03-23 08:08:18 UTC
Shift-insert now pastes from the CLIPBOARD instead of pasting from PRIMARY. This affects gnome-terminal as well.

Steps to reproduce:

* Open a terminal in X (either vte or gnome-terminal)
* Type ls to get some text on the screen
* Use mouse to highlight some text
* Using keyoard type ctrl-shift-c to copy to CLIPBOARD
* Use mouse to highlight a different piece of text
* Verify that it's in PRIMARY by middle clicking. The second set of text should be pasted where the cursor is.
* On keyboard type shift-insert. You'll get the text from CLIPBOARD instead of PRIMARY.

The original (and standard) behavour was that ctrl-shift-v would paste from CLIPBOARD and shift-insert pastes from PRIMARY.

Version information:

x11-libs/vte-0.11.18                 use: -debug -static
x11-terms/gnome-terminal-2.12.0      use: -debug -doc +python

Everything else Gnome-wise is the stable version. And so is most of the system.

Looking at this, it looks like an upstream problem:
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/vte/+bug/31354

Let me know if I can provide any more information.
Comment 1 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-30 17:06:38 UTC
Seeing vte's ChangeLog, this seems to have been fixed for vte-0.11.19. Could you try with vte-0.11.20 that is in our tree (hardmasked)?
Comment 2 Owen Berry 2006-03-31 07:42:16 UTC
Do you mean 0.12.0? There is not 0.11.20 that I can see.
Comment 3 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-31 17:42:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do you mean 0.12.0? There is not 0.11.20 that I can see.
> 

Indeed, sorry for the confusion. vte-0.12.0 doesn't depend on any other hardmasked stuff so it should be reasonable simple to test it. Thanks.
Comment 4 Owen Berry 2006-04-03 07:39:15 UTC
> Indeed, sorry for the confusion. vte-0.12.0 doesn't depend on any other
> hardmasked stuff so it should be reasonable simple to test it. Thanks.

Yes, that is fixed in 0.12.0. It also fixed the problem in gnome-terminal without recompilation. Thanks!
Comment 5 Owen Berry 2006-04-05 07:53:06 UTC
Note that I just tried 0.11.18 and this bug is NOT fixed there.
Comment 6 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 08:39:04 UTC
this should be consider solved for gnome 2.14 I think. If gnome 2.14 hits stable in the near future, I think it is not appropriate to patch 0.11.18. It would be one more patch that would need to be maintained for no good reason considering it is solved upstream.
Comment 7 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2006-10-11 20:42:25 UTC
Considering this fixed upstream, as 0.12.2 is stable on major arches.