Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 124235 - gfs-kernel-1.01.00 does not compile with newer kernel versions
Summary: gfs-kernel-1.01.00 does not compile with newer kernel versions
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 123842
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-27 01:52 UTC by Anders Bruun Olsen
Modified: 2006-03-02 01:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Patch to gfs-kernel to allow compile on newer kernel versions (gfs-kernel-compat.patch,1.60 KB, patch)
2006-02-27 01:55 UTC, Anders Bruun Olsen 		Details | Diff
Suggested gfs-kernel-1.01.00-r1 ebuild that applies attached patch (gfs-kernel-1.01.00-r1.ebuild,1.19 KB, text/plain)
2006-02-27 01:55 UTC, Anders Bruun Olsen 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anders Bruun Olsen 2006-02-27 01:52:36 UTC 
When trying to emerge gfs-kernel-1.01.00 on a machine running xen-sources-2.6.16-rc3 I ran into problems because of API changes in newer kernel-versions. i_sem and up/down has changed between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 to i_mutex and mutex_unlock/mutex_lock. Also a couple of API changes relating to superblocks seem to have happened in newer kernel versions.
Here is a patch that makes gfs-kernel compile on 2.6.16. Was also tested successfully on gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1.
Comment 1 Anders Bruun Olsen 2006-02-27 01:55:17 UTC 
Created attachment 80822 [details, diff]
Patch to gfs-kernel to allow compile on newer kernel versions
Comment 2 Anders Bruun Olsen 2006-02-27 01:55:59 UTC 
Created attachment 80823 [details]
Suggested gfs-kernel-1.01.00-r1 ebuild that applies attached patch
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-27 02:35:30 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 123842 ***
Comment 4 Christopher G. Stach II 2006-03-02 01:25:01 UTC 
Bad patch. :)