Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 118371 - Improving net-dns/djbdns and updating djbdns-setup
Summary: Improving net-dns/djbdns and updating djbdns-setup
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED)
URL: rsync://
Depends on:
Reported: 2006-01-09 02:35 UTC by Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Modified: 2006-09-29 16:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

files/djbdns-setup.patch (djbdns-setup.patch,16.15 KB, patch)
2006-01-09 02:37 UTC, Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Details | Diff
djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild.patch (djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild.patch,5.16 KB, patch)
2006-01-09 02:38 UTC, Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:35:14 UTC
I was poking in my script (djbdns-setup) and it turned a bit unreadable, so I fixed some whitespace, added some vim improvements and resolved the dependency on /sbin/

After that had a look at the current net-dns/djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild and did fix some comments and whitespace; Changed useq to use

Will be providing the patches below.
My portage overlay is accessible at:
Comment 1 Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:37:31 UTC
Created attachment 76604 [details, diff]

The patch to my script, djbdns-setup that goes to net-dns/djbdns/files
Comment 2 Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:38:57 UTC
Created attachment 76605 [details, diff]

Patch for current djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild
Comment 3 Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:40:55 UTC
Comment on attachment 76604 [details, diff]

too long of a name for a patch, fixing.
Comment 4 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-21 04:18:51 UTC
Done in -r17. Can you test it, please?
Comment 5 Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-23 09:35:54 UTC
Well, seems good to me.

newbin ${FILESDIR}/djbdns-setup-${PR} djbdns-setup
this is a good point

I see you didn't like the part about
 use ipv6 && {

I suggested that because it makes the code more clear and easier to maintain (that is why there are a few more comments and the double chdir). 

It is all right by me both ways.

Let's wait for a bit more beating.
Comment 6 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-29 16:59:02 UTC