Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 117503 - icc-9.0.030 version bump
Summary: icc-9.0.030 version bump
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 124429
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-02 15:48 UTC by tim
Modified: 2006-02-28 09:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tim 2006-01-02 15:48:31 UTC
one can emerge the most recent version of icc (9.0.030) by using icc-9.0.023.ebuild

would be great to have that in portage ...
Comment 1 Philippe Trottier (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-06 13:01:11 UTC
If someone tells me why is it masked, I'd be happy to fix the ebuild.
Comment 2 Michael Santos 2006-02-26 05:55:50 UTC
When icc-9.0.030 makes it into portage:

On amd64, I think app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat should be added
as a dependency for icc-9.0.030.  Otherwise I think the system is not
guaranteed to have the required 32-bit libstdc++.so.5 (because gcc
3.4.4 is the amd64 gcc, and it doesn't have libstdc++.so.5).

In practice, I had icc-9.0.030 (on my amd64 system) and icc failed
with the following error:

/opt/intel/compiler90/bin/mcpcom: error while loading shared
libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory compilation aborted for main.c (code 127)

/opt/intel/compiler90/doc/INSTALL.txt warns that this error indicates
a lack of the 32-bit libstdc++.so.5 (though at this point my system
had no libstdc++.so.5 at all, only libstdc++.so.6).

I emerged libstdc++ thinking it would give me libstdc++.so.5, which it
did, but only in 64-bit.  Then I emerged emul-linux-x86-compat and now
icc works (or at least compiles something simple without complaint --
I haven't actually tested it yet).

Sorry for the verbosity, especially since icc-9 isn't even unmasked.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-28 09:11:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 124429 ***