Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 117246 - please stabilize dev-python/qscintilla-1.5.1 and related packages
Summary: please stabilize dev-python/qscintilla-1.5.1 and related packages
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Highest normal (vote)
Assignee: PPC Porters
Depends on:
Blocks: 83813
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2005-12-30 18:24 UTC by Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-02-23 09:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-30 18:24:07 UTC
O.k. this is a bit more complicated. This is not only the request to mark stable, but also a change in version numbering. So please mark

>=qscintilla-1.54 testing ( the ebuilds will be removed later )

Also to be marked stable (as you're affected)


Thanks everyone. :)
Comment 1 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-31 02:29:11 UTC
Do you really want us to downgrade >=1.54 to testing? Most arches (all except ppc and x86) don't have anything <1.54 stable.. Or did you mean >1.54?
Comment 2 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-31 02:43:45 UTC
i just realized that i probably should read the title of a bug before asking dumb questions.. sorry for the bugspam :D
Comment 3 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-31 04:17:42 UTC
amd64 done
Comment 4 Chris White (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-01 23:27:44 UTC
Before I go off and do this, let me make sure I understand correctly.  The current setup is like so:

qscintilla-1.5.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~ia64 ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc x86"
qscintilla-1.54.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ia64 amd64"
qscintilla-1.6.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"
qscintilla-1.60.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ~ia64 amd64"
qscintilla-1.61.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ia64 amd64 ppc64"
qscintilla-1.65.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~sparc ~alpha ~ia64 ~amd64 ppc64"

1.5.1 is actually newer than 1.54, but because of the way portage handles version-ing, 1.54 will show up as newer.  So you want us to mark 1.{54,6,60,61,65) as ~arch and 1.5.1 as stable so the versioning happens properly.  Then once that's done 1.{54,60,61,65} will be removed leaving 1.5.1 as stable, and 1.6 as unstable.  This all sound right?
Comment 5 Howard B. Golden 2006-01-02 00:21:49 UTC
Chris: Re comment #4:

Your statement is correct, but this may be an easier way to understand the situation:

Scintilla 1.54 was used in QScintilla 1.2
Scintilla 1.60 was used in QScintilla 1.3
Scintilla 1.61 was used in QScintilla 1.4
Scintilla 1.62 was used in QScintilla 1.5.1
Scintilla 1.65 was used in QScintilla 1.6

Therefore, the two latest versions of QScintilla are 1.5.1 and 1.6. QScintilla 1.5.1 is actually newer than Scintilla 1.54, 1.60 and 1.61. QScintilla 1.6 is the same vintage as Scintilla 1.65.

When the dust settles, we'll be left with QScintilla 1.5.1 (stable) and QScintilla 1.6 (testing).
Comment 6 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-02 02:22:17 UTC
Yes and yes.
Comment 7 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-04 10:41:00 UTC
I have to add media-sound/albumart-1.5.0-r1 to the list. Please mark it stable a well. (:
Comment 8 Chris White (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 01:03:29 UTC
x86 stable on all, couple of things onced I produced the described setup:

PyQt-3.8.1 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since PyQt-3.14.1-r1 was stable anyways.

cute-0.2.9 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since cute-0.2.9-r2 was stable anyways.

eric-3.5.1 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since eric-3.7.2-r1 was stable anyways.

Comment 9 Herbie Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 07:21:13 UTC
albumart-1.5.0-r1 stable on amd64
Comment 10 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 12:44:16 UTC
sparc is done, hope i didn't miss anything ;)
Comment 11 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 07:40:06 UTC
qscintilla-1.5.1 was already stable on ppc
albumart-1.5.0-r1 marked stable on ppc now

Comment 12 Jose Luis Rivero (yoswink) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 12:48:37 UTC
With respect to alpha, we have:

qscintilla-1.54 is stable (all other versions marked testing)

dev-python/sip-4.2.1 and dev-python/PyQt-3.14.1-r1 are now stable too. No more packages were affected by the update in alpha.
Comment 13 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-24 11:37:40 UTC
ppc64 done
Comment 14 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-31 15:40:55 UTC
If you could spend some ia64 cycles, please!? I'd like to clean up the mess. :)
Comment 15 Alan Jackson 2006-02-03 18:57:45 UTC
Fixed on AMD64
Comment 16 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-17 07:36:48 UTC
alpha and ia64 are finally fixed up.  Yoswink had fixed up qscintilla earlier for alpha, but then I came through and broke things because I misunderstood.  Sorry about that!
Comment 17 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-17 14:14:25 UTC
based on the cc list, I think this can be closed now
Comment 18 Howard B. Golden 2006-02-17 15:18:11 UTC
Re: Comment #17: Aron, looking at CVS, I think this isn't quite fixed: Versions of qscintilla > 1.6 are still marked stable on PPC. These must be marked unstable. Then, all qscintilla ebuilds > 1.6 must be removed.
Comment 19 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-22 15:11:42 UTC
Thanks Howard, it looks like the ppc team was missed somewhere along the line
Comment 20 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-23 09:11:50 UTC
I cleaned up yesterday, so this is not an issue anymore.