Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 113543 - dev-libs/luabind removal request
Summary: dev-libs/luabind removal request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High blocker (vote)
Assignee: C++ Team [disbanded]
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 201944 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 90374
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-11-25 02:42 UTC by Tiago Scolari
Modified: 2007-12-11 15:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tiago Scolari 2005-11-25 02:42:15 UTC
Aparently boost-1.31 was removed from portage from some reason, and this is
causing dependies do break. If you do something like -uD world, it just stops
because of this. 




Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Sync portage for the lastest ebuilds
2. have boost 1.31 as dependecy of something already installed
3. try to do a emerge -uD<pv> world

Actual Results:  
emerge -uDpv world

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies -
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=dev-libs/boost-1.31*".


!!! Problem with ebuild dev-libs/luabind-6-r1
!!! Possibly a DEPEND/*DEPEND problem.

!!! Depgraph creation failed.


Expected Results:  
A list of packages that can be updated.
Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-25 09:10:14 UTC
Portage tree broken for 7 hours now.
Comment 2 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-11-25 12:58:11 UTC
Does luabind need =boost-1.31*? Or should it be changed to >=boost-1.31?
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-11-25 15:38:54 UTC
dont post links to forums

luabind sucks if it had that sort of DEPEND anyways
Comment 4 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-25 16:14:15 UTC
It doesn't work without that version of boost.  There are _alot_ of fixes
upstream, but no releases since 2003.  It looks like upstream CVS will work with
1.32 from what they are saying, but no idea about 1.33.  Last time upstream
touched CVS was a couple months ago, so who knows how active it is or if a new
release is pending.
Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-25 20:16:03 UTC
Added to p.mask.  I'll remove it in 2 weeks if no one steps up to fix it.
Comment 6 Michael Kedzierski 2005-12-02 15:59:35 UTC
I'm trying to install YAKE (yake.org) which depends on both boost 1.33 and
luabind, so it works for some people out there. I'll look into it a bit further.
Comment 7 Michael Kedzierski 2005-12-02 16:03:58 UTC
Hmm, it seems that the YAKE people are pulling luabind from CVS.
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-22 05:16:51 UTC
Reopen to request removal. Been package.masked for 7 months.

# Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> (12 Dec 2005)
# Luabind doesn't compile with the latest stable boost, and no updates
# for awhile.
dev-libs/luabind
Comment 9 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-08-01 19:15:43 UTC
removed
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-11 13:59:29 UTC
*** Bug 201944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Matija "hook" Šuklje 2007-12-11 14:43:13 UTC
From what I can see from the project's homepage, the current version (0.7): "[...] requires Boost 1.32.0 or 1.33.0 to be installed (only boost headers)"

The lowest version in portage is 1.33.1 and I don't know if it really explicitly depends on 1.33.0 or is it just badly explained on the webpage. I'll report if I find out something new.
Comment 12 Matija "hook" Šuklje 2007-12-11 15:48:34 UTC
On #luabind irc channel they say that Luabind 0.7 should work on 1.32.x and 1.33.x versions of Boost. It still depends on Lua 5.0, but the next release should be working with 5.1.