Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 109773 - evince-0.4.0-r2 ebuild violates sandbox
Summary: evince-0.4.0-r2 ebuild violates sandbox
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 100972
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High blocker
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-18 22:34 UTC by Rumi Szabolcs
Modified: 2005-10-21 03:10 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rumi Szabolcs 2005-10-18 22:34:06 UTC
Found cached translation database
Merging translations into evince-thumbnailer.schemas.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0/thumbnailer'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0'
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---------------------------
LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-app-text_-_evince-0.4.0-r2-32745.log"

open_wr:   /usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0/config.sub
(symlink to /usr/share/libtool/config.sub)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge =gnome-2.12.0
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
it failed to emerge =)


# emerge info
Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.0, gcc-3.3.6, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
2.6.12.3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.12.3 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.10
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r10
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env
/usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.math.bme.hu http://gentoo.mirror.icd.hu/"
LINGUAS="hu en ja ko zh_TW zh_CN"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/usr/src/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acpi adns alsa apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt cups curl
dvdr eds emboss encode esd fam flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif glut gnome gpm
gstreamer gtk gtk2 guile idea imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jpeg junit lcms ldap
libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx mmx2 mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nntp ogg
oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib perl png python quicktime readline real samba
sdl slang sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts
unicode vorbis xinerama xml2 xmms xv xvid zlib linguas_hu linguas_en linguas_ja
linguas_ko linguas_zh_TW linguas_zh_CN userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, MAKEOPTS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY
Comment 1 Rumi Szabolcs 2005-10-18 22:42:06 UTC
Ooooops... Now I noticed that there were strange things at the start
of the build already:

>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking evince-0.4.0.tar.bz2 to /usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work
 * Applying evince-0.4.0-t1lib_is_t1.patch ...                                 
                                                                               
                                                            [ ok ] * Applying
evince-0.4.0-display-menu.patch ...                                            
                                                                               
                                                [ ok ] * Applying
evince-0.4.0-no-tiff.patch ...                                                 
                                                                               
                                                [ ok ] * Fixing OMF Makefiles...
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                 [ ok ]>>> Source unpacked.
 * Running elibtoolize in: evince-0.4.0
 *   Applying portage-1.2.0.patch ...
 *   Applying max_cmd_len-1.5.0.patch ...
 *   Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ...
 * econf: updating evince-0.4.0/config.sub with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub
ACCESS DENIED   open_wr:  
/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0/config.sub
cp: cannot create regular file
`/usr/src/tmp/portage/evince-0.4.0-r2/work/evince-0.4.0/config.sub': Permission
denied
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc
--localstatedir=/var/lib --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-dvi --disable-t1lib
--disable-dbus --enable-tiff --disable-nautilus --disable-deprecated
--disable-dvi --disable-t1lib --disable-dbus --enable-tiff --disable-nautilus
--disable-deprecated --disable-dvi --disable-t1lib --disable-dbus --enable-tiff
--disable-nautilus --disable-deprecated --disable-gtk-doc

The /usr/src/tmp filesystem is not full and the permissions are OK,
all other ebuilds work.
Comment 2 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-20 06:20:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 100972 ***
Comment 3 Rumi Szabolcs 2005-10-21 03:10:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 100972 ***

Why do you think it is a duplicate of that one? That is a different
error that is said to be resolved in 0.4.0 while this is an error
in 0.4.0-r2 that still exists...