Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 104803 - emerge doesnt work after upgrade from 2004.0
Summary: emerge doesnt work after upgrade from 2004.0
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 63400
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core - Configuration (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-04 06:27 UTC by Thomas
Modified: 2005-09-04 07:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Thomas 2005-09-04 06:27:00 UTC
>>> Updating Portage cache...  ...done! 
 
!!! 'str' object has no attribute 'insert' 
!!! 'rm -Rf /usr/portage/profiles; emerge sync' may fix this. If it does 
!!! not then please report this to bugs.gentoo.org and, if possible, a dev 
!!! on #gentoo (irc.freenode.org) 
 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
problem doesnt go away by following the provided  
rm -Rf /usr/portage/profiles; emerge sync
Comment 1 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-04 06:38:57 UTC
There are clear upgrade instructions: 
 
# Gentoo has switched to 2.6 as the defaults for headers/kernels.  If you wish 
# to use 2.4 headers/kernels, then you should do the following to upgrade: 
# emerge -n '>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51' 
# cd /etc/ 
# rm make.profile 
# ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4 make.profile 
 
# If you wish to use the default 2.6 kernel, do the following: 
# emerge -n '>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51' 
# cd /etc/ 
# rm make.profile 
# ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0 make.profile 
 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63400 ***
Comment 2 Thomas 2005-09-04 06:55:31 UTC
This does not help, i tried it as proposed. Still get the same error message.  
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-04 07:06:40 UTC
See Bug 63400, comment #49



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63400 ***