Summary: | net-p2p/transmission-3* apply debian patch to use ayatana indicators | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Mike Gilbert <floppym> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | candrews |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 887171 |
Description
Pacho Ramos
2023-01-20 14:38:14 UTC
Sounds good, thanks for the background info. I'll update it shortly. The Debian patch wont work for us; it patches configure.ac, but not the cmake build files. An oddity: dev-libs/libayatana-appindicator-0.5.91 installs libayatana-appindicator3, but has SLOT=0. Is that correct? Seems like a mistake to me. The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2e9e62c5ae19c8565310c4d652647efe6084e332 commit 2e9e62c5ae19c8565310c4d652647efe6084e332 Author: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-01-20 19:43:15 +0000 Commit: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-01-20 19:43:52 +0000 net-p2p/transmission: update appindicator dep Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/891487 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> net-p2p/transmission/transmission-4.0.0_beta3.ebuild | 4 ++-- net-p2p/transmission/transmission-9999.ebuild | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Thanks for the fast action... I replied to one question you made in https://bugs.gentoo.org/887171#c2 (I see you are not in the CC list there... then.. to ensure you get the reply) (In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #3) > An oddity: dev-libs/libayatana-appindicator-0.5.91 installs > libayatana-appindicator3, but has SLOT=0. Is that correct? Seems like a > mistake to me. Well... no gtk2 support will be added... and for gtk4 the situation is pretty obscure currently (https://github.com/AyatanaIndicators/libayatana-appindicator/issues/22) and I cannot predict what will happen to it (or if it will be implemented by another project or...) :/ Then I simply planned to act when the support finally is added... somewhere (if ever, I hope) And, also (and specially), because it is hard to predict now if, in the future, there will be a dev-libs/libayatana-appindicator4 additional package or a dev-libs/libayatana-appindicator with two slots and those -r300 vs -r400 revisions that we need to use on those cases |