Bug 751337 – app-accessibility/kontrast, dev-util/clazy, kde-misc/markdownpart keywording

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Andreas Sturmlechner 2020-10-26 14:08:46 UTC]

Required by upcoming KDE Release Service 20.12.0 (kdeaccessibility-meta):

app-accessibility/kontrast


Referenced as optfeature from keyworded packages:

dev-util/clazy
kde-misc/markdownpart
media-gfx/kgraphviewer

[Comment 1 Sam James 2020-10-28 22:41:46 UTC]

~arm64 added (thanks, happy to add any more keywords if we're missing any ala ppc64 by the way)

[Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner 2020-11-05 12:22:45 UTC]

Ping x86.

Re-adding arm64 for dev-util/kdevelop-php, required by Release Service 20.08.3 (kde-apps/umbrello-20.08.3).

[Comment 3 Sam James 2020-11-06 14:55:14 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 4 Larry the Git Cow 2020-11-08 15:23:29 UTC]

The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=73316cf8782a35c5c07adc5f81c9574f2468741f

commit 73316cf8782a35c5c07adc5f81c9574f2468741f
Author:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2020-11-08 15:22:24 +0000
Commit:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2020-11-08 15:22:43 +0000

    kde-apps: Drop 20.08.2 remains
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751337
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2
    Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>

 .../kde-apps-meta/kde-apps-meta-20.08.2.ebuild     | 26 --------
 kde-apps/kdesdk-meta/kdesdk-meta-20.08.2-r1.ebuild | 31 ----------
 kde-apps/umbrello/Manifest                         |  1 -
 kde-apps/umbrello/umbrello-20.08.2-r1.ebuild       | 70 ----------------------
 4 files changed, 128 deletions(-)

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=9c3dbbd10d263f8b74f013f6720328c9b4f6a0b7

commit 9c3dbbd10d263f8b74f013f6720328c9b4f6a0b7
Author:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2020-11-08 15:12:24 +0000
Commit:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2020-11-08 15:22:42 +0000

    kde-apps: Rollover ~arm64 keywords
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751337
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2
    Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>

 kde-apps/kde-apps-meta/kde-apps-meta-20.08.3.ebuild | 2 +-
 kde-apps/kdesdk-meta/kdesdk-meta-20.08.3.ebuild     | 2 +-
 kde-apps/umbrello/umbrello-20.08.3.ebuild           | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eb212ae3b45643acccfb46653008440aea2ac08f

commit eb212ae3b45643acccfb46653008440aea2ac08f
Author:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2020-11-08 14:58:10 +0000
Commit:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2020-11-08 15:22:42 +0000

    profiles: arm64: Mask >=kde-apps/umbrello-20.08.3[php]
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751337
    Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>

 profiles/arch/arm64/package.use.mask | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

[Comment 5 Sam James 2020-11-08 15:57:18 UTC]

I can't read your mind - so I readded the blocker (as explained in the other bug) because I could not build a dependency.

Please let me know what you're thinking so we can talk things out.

[Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner 2020-11-08 16:16:13 UTC]

I'm no stranger to long bugzilla dependency chains myself, but I consider a build failure of a dependency of a dependency an invalid blocker. You can comment why you are unable to proceed at the time, but some other member of ~arm64 team may very well be able to do so.

I don't know how long it will take Qt proj to fix it, so this being a tangential blocker to bug 753242 I prefer this bug not being held up by a build failure in an indirect dependency of kdevelop-php.

[Comment 7 Sam James 2020-11-08 19:45:37 UTC]

(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #6)
> I'm no stranger to long bugzilla dependency chains myself, but I consider a
> build failure of a dependency of a dependency an invalid blocker. You can
> comment why you are unable to proceed at the time, but some other member of
> ~arm64 team may very well be able to do so.
> 
> I don't know how long it will take Qt proj to fix it, so this being a
> tangential blocker to bug 753242 I prefer this bug not being held up by a
> build failure in an indirect dependency of kdevelop-php.

It _is_ a dodgy blocker and I'd feel frustrated if someone added it to one of my bugs. On the other hand, we both know I'm the one doing the keywording, and practically speaking, that was the thing stopping me doing it.

I'm confident you know by now that I don't make stuff in the way for no reason and I go out of my way to fix things just because they're broken, even if they're not "my job", so this was on my list to figure out anyway. :)

I'm glad it turns out it's USE-conditional anyway so it can be masked, I just didn't realise that or I would have proposed it.

I completely agree with the logic, I just wish you'd said rather than removing the blocker silently - I couldn't know that's what you were thinking.

Thanks!