Bug 692382 – =app-misc/lcdproc-0.5.9: stabilize

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2019-08-17 19:40:08 UTC]

@maintainer, please call for stabilization by CC'ing arches when ready.

<app-misc/lcdproc-0.5.9 needs to be cleaned up due to:

* 0.5.2-r1 relies on vulnerable automake:1.9
* Old EAPI's can go away as well

[Comment 1 Conrad Kostecki 2019-08-17 20:40:38 UTC]

Hi Aaron,
there is already a ticket for stabilization: https://bugs.gentoo.org/671028

But it will take some time, until I can rekeyword for ppc and ppc64, since there are some changes. If it needs to be faster, would it be okay, to stable only for x86 and amd64, but drop current stable for ppc/ppc64 an rekeyword later, until all issues are revoled?

Cheers
Conrad

[Comment 2 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2019-08-17 22:13:51 UTC]

(In reply to Conrad Kostecki from comment #1)
> Hi Aaron,
> there is already a ticket for stabilization: https://bugs.gentoo.org/671028
> 
> But it will take some time, until I can rekeyword for ppc and ppc64, since
> there are some changes. If it needs to be faster, would it be okay, to
> stable only for x86 and amd64, but drop current stable for ppc/ppc64 an
> rekeyword later, until all issues are revoled?
> 
> Cheers
> Conrad

That is up to you as the maintainer.  If you want to drop keywords for those arches until they are able to stable it then that is fine.

[Comment 3 Conrad Kostecki 2019-08-18 00:14:54 UTC]

(In reply to Aaron Bauman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Conrad Kostecki from comment #1)
> > Hi Aaron,
> > there is already a ticket for stabilization: https://bugs.gentoo.org/671028
> > 
> > But it will take some time, until I can rekeyword for ppc and ppc64, since
> > there are some changes. If it needs to be faster, would it be okay, to
> > stable only for x86 and amd64, but drop current stable for ppc/ppc64 an
> > rekeyword later, until all issues are revoled?
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Conrad
> 
> That is up to you as the maintainer.  If you want to drop keywords for those
> arches until they are able to stable it then that is fine.

Allright, thanks. So in this case, I would like todo only amd64 and x86. ppc* will be dropped and readded in future, until my PRs are merged, which should fix those on ppc*.

[Comment 4 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2019-08-18 02:35:30 UTC]

(In reply to Conrad Kostecki from comment #3)
> (In reply to Aaron Bauman from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Conrad Kostecki from comment #1)
> > > Hi Aaron,
> > > there is already a ticket for stabilization: https://bugs.gentoo.org/671028
> > > 
> > > But it will take some time, until I can rekeyword for ppc and ppc64, since
> > > there are some changes. If it needs to be faster, would it be okay, to
> > > stable only for x86 and amd64, but drop current stable for ppc/ppc64 an
> > > rekeyword later, until all issues are revoled?
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > Conrad
> > 
> > That is up to you as the maintainer.  If you want to drop keywords for those
> > arches until they are able to stable it then that is fine.
> 
> Allright, thanks. So in this case, I would like todo only amd64 and x86.
> ppc* will be dropped and readded in future, until my PRs are merged, which
> should fix those on ppc*.

Which PR's?

[Comment 5 Conrad Kostecki 2019-08-18 10:19:56 UTC]

(In reply to Aaron Bauman from comment #4)
> Which PR's?

Have a look:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12736
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12737

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2019-08-19 05:43:55 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2019-08-19 11:39:39 UTC]

x86 stable. Closing.