| Summary: | Qt 5.5.1 stable request | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michael Palimaka (kensington) <kensington> |
| Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Qt Bug Alias <qt> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | flyser42, mihais23 |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 552942, 562396, 563898, 564560, 564920, 564922, 565588, 565764, 565806, 566580, 569926, 569928, 572814, 574256, 574636 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 552394, 558460, 558602, 558660, 560900, 562832, 562834, 564622, 570202, 570746, 576204, 577074, 577076, 577180, 579366, 579568, 579602, 581832, 581872, 581874, 581878, 584584 | ||
| Attachments: |
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v1
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v2 qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v3 qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v4 |
||
|
Description
Michael Palimaka (kensington)
2015-12-27 17:55:43 UTC
Created attachment 422964 [details]
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v1
Can we go ahead with non-x86 archs? (In reply to Michael Palimaka (kensington) from comment #2) > Can we go ahead with non-x86 archs? Feel free to proceed, but please double check the stabilization list, at least the version of qtmultimedia is outdated. Created attachment 423934 [details]
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v2
Add new revision of qtmultimedia and include qtimageformats (for KDE).
Created attachment 425180 [details]
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v3
Added a minimal set of stable candidates for ppc (requested by ago).
I'm considering removing qtsensors from the stabilisation list. AFAICS it's there only because it's a dep of qtwebkit[orientation], but I guess HTML5 orientation support doesn't make much sense on non-mobile devices... so it's probably easier to stable mask the relative USE flag. What do you think?
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #5) > I'm considering removing qtsensors from the stabilisation list. AFAICS it's > there only because it's a dep of qtwebkit[orientation], but I guess HTML5 > orientation support doesn't make much sense on non-mobile devices... so it's > probably easier to stable mask the relative USE flag. What do you think? It's also used by newer versions of sci-mathematics/rstudio[-dedicated] which may block a potential future stabilisation. (In reply to Michael Palimaka (kensington) from comment #6) > It's also used by newer versions of sci-mathematics/rstudio[-dedicated] > which may block a potential future stabilisation. Right, but only on amd64 and x86. And arm might actually make sense for qtwebkit[orientation]. So let's keep it. Created attachment 425486 [details]
qt-5.5.1-stabilisation-list-v4
Add new revision of qtgui with crash fix.
amd64 stable Stable for HPPA PPC64. Additionally could we get qtserialport on the stable train too? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577074 And qtbluetooth https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577076 Not in this bug. Let's handle those stable requests separately. arm stable ppc stable @x86: ping @x86: 2nd ping x86 stable |
