Summary: | app-text/lodgeit: missing license | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED) <qnikst> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | licenses, skrattaren |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 436214 |
Description
Ulrich Müller
2012-11-24 15:35:55 UTC
lodgeit as a pastebin-project (we're using only script for it) is distributed under BSD license, for example: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/src/1ca55b8189de1aa375b0c24b3c931b950b1379c7/lodgeit/application.py?at=default#cl-9 Would it suffice? I would be happier if lodgeit.py and lodgeit.vim themselves would contain a short notice saying that they're BSD licensed. I've written a message to lodgeit.vim maintainer and filed a PR at BitBucket for CLI paster: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/pull-request/11/ (In reply to comment #3) > I've ... filed a PR at BitBucket > for CLI paster: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/pull-request/11/ Accepted upstream. Now we can bump version and be sure of license. Or wait a bit for lodgeit.vim maintainer. Ping. Any news? (In reply to comment #5) > Ping. Any news? Nope. lodgeit.vim author hasn't responded, though I got no "Cannot be delivered" message. Here's him at GitHub: https://github.com/mitsuhiko Though I can't figure out how to reach him :) He hangs out on #pocoo (mitsuhiko). Behold lodgeit.vim 0.3: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1965 Released under MIT, though. And uses another pastebin, hehe. I'm not entirely happy about the situation, but I've changed lodgeit-0.3_p20120507.ebuild and lodgeit-0.3_p20120618-r1.ebuild to LICENSE="BSD MIT". @Licenses team: Please reopen if you disagree. |