The package consists of a python script and a vim syntax file, Neither of them say anything about the terms under which they can be distributed. Also I cannot find any license in the upstream repository. We need some license for this package, so can you please sort this out with upstream?
lodgeit as a pastebin-project (we're using only script for it) is distributed under BSD license, for example: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/src/1ca55b8189de1aa375b0c24b3c931b950b1379c7/lodgeit/application.py?at=default#cl-9 Would it suffice?
I would be happier if lodgeit.py and lodgeit.vim themselves would contain a short notice saying that they're BSD licensed.
I've written a message to lodgeit.vim maintainer and filed a PR at BitBucket for CLI paster: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/pull-request/11/
(In reply to comment #3) > I've ... filed a PR at BitBucket > for CLI paster: https://bitbucket.org/EnTeQuAk/lodgeit-main/pull-request/11/ Accepted upstream. Now we can bump version and be sure of license. Or wait a bit for lodgeit.vim maintainer.
Ping. Any news?
(In reply to comment #5) > Ping. Any news? Nope. lodgeit.vim author hasn't responded, though I got no "Cannot be delivered" message. Here's him at GitHub: https://github.com/mitsuhiko Though I can't figure out how to reach him :)
He hangs out on #pocoo (mitsuhiko). Behold lodgeit.vim 0.3: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1965 Released under MIT, though. And uses another pastebin, hehe.
I'm not entirely happy about the situation, but I've changed lodgeit-0.3_p20120507.ebuild and lodgeit-0.3_p20120618-r1.ebuild to LICENSE="BSD MIT". @Licenses team: Please reopen if you disagree.
