Summary: | sys-apps/portage new feature: preserve old libs to keep binary working | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Marcin Mirosław <bug> |
Component: | Enhancement/Feature Requests | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | floppym |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Marcin Mirosław
2011-09-15 11:57:24 UTC
That feature has been around for over an year or so *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 240323 *** Or duplicate of bug 337880, or one of the many others. In case you are confused Samuli's response: a similar feature to the one you describe (preserve-libs) has been implemented in portage-2.2. To install this version, add the following to package.keywords: sys-apps/portage ~* I've found it:) I tried use portage-2.2 and functionality looks ok for me (in context of this bug). (i've have some problem when libs is downgraded @preserved-libs didn't preserve libs, but this i'll report in other bug. If it isn't reported earlier) I can see portage-2.2 brings many new feature, it's great but portage-2.2 is too long masked. From my point of view it could be better to have lower number of features but more frequently. Thanks. (In reply to comment #4) > I can see portage-2.2 brings many new feature, it's great but portage-2.2 is > too long masked. From my point of view it could be better to have lower number > of features but more frequently. All features that are considered stable are enabled in portage-2.1.10.x. The only difference between the portage-2.1.10 branch and the portage-2.2 branch is a few constants that enable/disable features: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=1a540597eecef10c2346b32fa9ceb8e688cc9f92 Thanks for additional explanation! |