Bug 34553

Summary:	Several borked ebuilds
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Spider (RETIRED) <spider>
Component:	[OLD] Core system	Assignee:	Spider (RETIRED) <spider>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	major
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
URL:	http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/13992
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	34555, 34556, 34557, 34558, 34559, 34561, 34562, 34563, 34564, 34566, 34567, 34568, 34569, 34570, 34571, 34572, 34573, 34574, 34577, 34578, 34579, 34580, 34582, 34584, 34585, 34586, 34587, 34588, 34589, 35403
Bug Blocks:

Description Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-11-27 15:40:50 UTC

this is a wrapper bug, adding depends for all sub-bugs i find

Comment 1 Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-11-28 07:28:53 UTC

Arent the depends/blocks around the wrong way Spider ? Or am I looking at things upside-down

Comment 2 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-11-28 10:22:39 UTC

mm, mayhap, as they aren't supposed to block, but have a depend on this one.. seems to be impossible to do a one-way dependency in this though, but yes, they should problably be this ones blockers, so when all blockers are done, they are clean...

Comment 3 Martin Holzer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-12-07 07:53:34 UTC

closing as only bug #34571 is left

Comment 4 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-12-07 08:02:40 UTC

reopening until then, i want this for tracking. 

reassinging it to myself too

Comment 5 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-12-07 08:12:02 UTC

and moving the blocks around

Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-08-11 05:58:23 UTC

Closing.