| Summary: | stabilize =sys-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1-r1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Peter Volkov (RETIRED) <pva> |
| Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 321913, 339086, 339146 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 338344 | ||
|
Description
Peter Volkov (RETIRED)
2010-09-25 10:26:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > base-system: >=gettext-0.18 is necessary for dev-util/crow-designer > stabilization (bug 338344). Is it Ok to stabilize gettext? What version? > There's several packages still failing with gettext >= 0.18, bug 321913 once the blockers are done, i see no reason to hold up stabilization (In reply to comment #2) > once the blockers are done, i see no reason to hold up stabilization > they are done now :) let's proceed ppc64 stable amd64 stable I'm getting failing tests when building with nocxx USE flag on x86. Posted as Bug 339419. i dont think USE=nocxx is something to block stabilization over (In reply to comment #7) > i dont think USE=nocxx is something to block stabilization over > Based on what exactly? To me it seems that gettext builds this file and it's tests cause to fail on it. Isn't the point of tests to detect these kind of things and prevent bad things from happening? x86 stable, thanks Myckel (also for detecting the test failure with nocxx) I think the nocxx issue shouldn't block this stabilization, but is worth fixing. (In reply to comment #8) > Based on what exactly? based on my opinion arm stable Stable for HPPA. Stable for PPC. Tested on SPARC64, no regressions found, please stabilise. alpha/ia64/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing |