Bug 338654 – stabilize =sys-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1-r1

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Peter Volkov (RETIRED) 2010-09-25 10:26:28 UTC]

base-system: >=gettext-0.18 is necessary for dev-util/crow-designer stabilization (bug 338344). Is it Ok to stabilize gettext? What version?

[Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-09-25 10:37:49 UTC]

(In reply to comment #0)
> base-system: >=gettext-0.18 is necessary for dev-util/crow-designer
> stabilization (bug 338344). Is it Ok to stabilize gettext? What version?
> 

There's several packages still failing with gettext >= 0.18, bug 321913

[Comment 2 SpanKY 2010-09-25 18:43:42 UTC]

once the blockers are done, i see no reason to hold up stabilization

[Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-09-29 08:44:09 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> once the blockers are done, i see no reason to hold up stabilization
> 

they are done now :)   let's proceed

[Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-09-29 15:57:03 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 5 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-09-30 09:38:55 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 6 Myckel Habets 2010-10-02 03:40:34 UTC]

I'm getting failing tests when building with nocxx USE flag on x86. Posted as Bug 339419.

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2010-10-07 06:21:14 UTC]

i dont think USE=nocxx is something to block stabilization over

[Comment 8 Myckel Habets 2010-10-07 07:16:22 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> i dont think USE=nocxx is something to block stabilization over
> 

Based on what exactly? To me it seems that gettext builds this file and it's tests cause to fail on it. Isn't the point of tests to detect these kind of things and prevent bad things from happening?

[Comment 9 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2010-10-07 09:38:04 UTC]

x86 stable, thanks Myckel (also for detecting the test failure with nocxx)

I think the nocxx issue shouldn't block this stabilization, but is worth fixing.

[Comment 10 SpanKY 2010-10-07 16:01:42 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Based on what exactly?

based on my opinion

[Comment 11 Markus Meier 2010-10-11 22:19:32 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 12 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-10-12 17:27:38 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 13 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-10-13 01:49:26 UTC]

Stable for PPC.

[Comment 14 Alex Buell 2010-11-04 01:33:28 UTC]

Tested on SPARC64, no regressions found, please stabilise. 

[Comment 15 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2010-12-04 15:34:23 UTC]

alpha/ia64/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing