Summary: | sci-geosciences/josm version bump to 3695 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | quazgar <quazgar> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Hanno Böck <hanno> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alchark, chewi, flow, gentoo, sci-geosciences, tl |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
josm-3.094.ebuild
Ebuild with more correct version number. A live subversion ebuild |
Description
quazgar
2010-03-08 22:33:59 UTC
Created attachment 222739 [details]
josm-3.094.ebuild
Ebuild for the current josm version.
Why is this dot placed (randomly?) in the svn revision number? Shouldn't this just be josm-3094.ebuild? Anyway, should be added to portage, works fine here. Created attachment 226643 [details]
Ebuild with more correct version number.
Good point, the dot could of course be removed, that would also be more consistent with the upstream naming (just the svn revision number). I think I put it there to continue the naming convention of the previous ebuilds ("2.561" and "2.255"). So here's the new ebuild :)
Does also compile the current version 3201. Created attachment 230205 [details]
A live subversion ebuild
An ebuild to simply use the upstream SVN repo rather than bothering with different snapshots. Adapted from the one in portage.
The josm-3094.ebuild does also work with rev 3208. I did change version number so I have josm-3208.ebuild in my local portage I was able to compile it without problems and program is running well. please, can someone update portage tree? thanks Bump done, I'll have a look at the live ebuild later Although the bug summary says "bump to 3.094", but because the bug is still in "new" state: JOSM 3695 is out. Renaming the current ebuild works fine here (amd64). Changed summary accordingly bump done, won't add svn live ebuild to portage. |