| Summary: | =dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.19.1-r3 ~x86-fbsd keyword request | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) <rbu> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | gnome |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | KEYWORDREQ |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 227917 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 282293 | ||
|
Description
Robert Buchholz (RETIRED)
2009-08-22 10:09:20 UTC
Guess this would never have been fixed since I couldnt find any other bug report asking for keywording... I've done all but: - libgda-python, it requires libgda:3 which fails to build because of a broken bundled sqlite3 copy. We'll likely have to wait for a libgda:4 version. - xulrunner 1.9 enabled gtkmozembed-python. We're stuck with xulrunner 1.8 until, I hope, xulrunner 1.9.2. looks like we indeed missed bsd, sorry about that guys. If libgda is a problem, then I might consider adding use flags to this ebuild as requested per bug #108479 (originaly) so you'd be able to use.mask it. What do you think about that ? (In reply to comment #2) > looks like we indeed missed bsd, sorry about that guys. If libgda is a problem, > then I might consider adding use flags to this ebuild as requested per bug > #108479 (originaly) so you'd be able to use.mask it. What do you think about > that ? Seems I forgot to answer here... useflags & masking them would work for us. Maybe it would be better to just drop g-p-extras 2.14 since 2.19 is just a meta package and nothing should depend on it (maybe i'm wrong there though). Should be fixed in -r4, that includes "xulrunner" and "lingda" USE flags, both masked in x86-fbsd Best regards |