Summary: | Bump app-emacs/slime | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) <fauli> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Emacs project <emacs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | chris.burroughs, common-lisp |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED)
2009-01-29 07:25:32 UTC
I wonder if we should split off dev-lisp/swank as an own package, as suggested in bug 240327. Stelian, are you o.k. with slime-2.0_p20080731 being stbilised? I think that _p20080731 could be stabilized, although it's stable only compared to how SLIME generally is, pretty much in flux. Splitting slime in dev-lisp/swank, app-emacs/slime and app-xemacs/slime is ok, keeping in mind that they must always be kept in sync > Splitting slime in dev-lisp/swank, app-emacs/slime and app-xemacs/slime is ok,
> keeping in mind that they must always be kept in sync
The latter is what I wanted to know. If the versions are really bound together, then we shouldn't split it without a real need. So I suggest that we postpone any decision until there is activity on the XEmacs side.
Stabilisation of slime-2.0_p20080731 is handled in bug 257082. slime-2.0_p20101103 committed to portage tree. Thanks Stelian. |