Bug 21310

Summary:	a standard way to install includes (doinclude/doheader)
Product:	Gentoo Hosted Projects	Reporter:	Jason Toffaletti <catalyst>
Component:	PMS/EAPI	Assignee:	PMS/EAPI <pms>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	esigra, pinkbyte
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	in-eapi-5
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	174380

Description Jason Toffaletti 2003-05-19 22:33:37 UTC

there should be a standard way (doinclude? doheader?) to install library include files 
from ebuild scripts, similar to dolib, doman, doinfo, etc... 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-07-28 07:26:09 UTC

Putting a hold on feature requests for portage as they are drowning out the 
bugs. Most of these features should be available in the next major version of 
portage. But for the time being, they are just drowning out the major bugs and 
delaying the next version's progress. 
 
Any bugs that contain patches and any bugs for etc-update or dispatch-conf can 
be reopened. Sorry, I'm just not good enough with bugzilla. ;)

Comment 2 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-01-11 12:07:32 UTC

Reopen for consideration.

Comment 3 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-01-11 12:07:52 UTC

And now really reopening.

Comment 4 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev

2012-08-31 16:25:51 UTC

PMS patch: <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=fe5cf5e91299156dc74338c897d9a7bfb8883f5a>

Portage patch: <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=e7e4c3720582a7ab938266e50e53d162f5248488>

Comment 5 Zac Medico gentoo-dev

2012-09-15 20:19:25 UTC

Do we intend to support the -r option? The pms patch does not document it, but the portage patch supports -r since the arguments are passed to doins.

Comment 6 Zac Medico gentoo-dev

2012-09-15 20:24:37 UTC

Or maybe -r should be implied?

Comment 7 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev

2012-09-15 20:44:26 UTC

The code for doheader was copied from doconfd and doenvd. Is it intentional that these support -r?

Comment 8 Zac Medico gentoo-dev

2012-09-15 20:46:19 UTC

(In reply to comment #7)
> The code for doheader was copied from doconfd and doenvd. Is it intentional
> that these support -r?

Probably not. I think recursion is desirable for doheader though, since feedback on the gentoo-dev ml specifically included recursive cases.

Comment 9 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev

2012-09-23 06:46:03 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> PMS patch:
> <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;
> h=fe5cf5e91299156dc74338c897d9a7bfb8883f5a>

Commits in master:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=e0bf16a23cde4c71eefb20e8b388d70aadc4269e
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=d298236671b888efb7831139a46a411ff225b673