Thanks!
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1864571b9061a7d95dafe6d259fb369058a8e51a commit 1864571b9061a7d95dafe6d259fb369058a8e51a Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2025-02-13 10:43:22 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2025-02-13 10:43:54 +0000 profiles/arch: stable-mask sys-fs/mdadm[corosync] on non-amd64/x86 sys-cluster/corosync isn't stabled on most arches. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/949699 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.stable.mask | 4 ++++ profiles/arch/base/package.use.stable.mask | 6 +++++- profiles/arch/x86/package.use.stable.mask | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Sanity check failed: > sys-fs/mdadm-4.3-r1 > depend arm stable profile default/linux/arm/23.0 (46 total) > sys-cluster/corosync > depend arm dev profile default/linux/arm/23.0/armv4 (69 total) > sys-cluster/corosync > rdepend arm stable profile default/linux/arm/23.0 (46 total) > sys-cluster/corosync > rdepend arm dev profile default/linux/arm/23.0/armv4 (69 total) > sys-cluster/corosync
arm64 done
amd64 done
x86 done
arm done
ppc64 done
ppc done
sparc done
hppa done all arches done