Let's have this in stable, maybe?
Maybe it would be interesting to use "igor" color scheme to have a default that works for white and black backgrounds: https://bugs.gentoo.org/924627#c8
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #1) > Maybe it would be interesting to use "igor" color scheme to have a default > that works for white and black backgrounds: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/924627#c8 I don't think this is the right place to discuss that -- it would mean delaying stabilisation anyway. (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #0) > Let's have this in stable, maybe? The problem is that upstream started making betas in preparation for a release to fix regressions from 661, but it hasn't happened yet.
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #1) > > Maybe it would be interesting to use "igor" color scheme to have a default > > that works for white and black backgrounds: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/924627#c8 > > I don't think this is the right place to discuss that -- it would mean > delaying stabilisation anyway. Sorry, it was not with the aim of discussing it, but more to note the issue (for the case it was forgotten) as, maybe, we will receive some more complaints of people using a white background once it hits stable :/. But no intention to delay the stabilization (that is the reason I didn't put the other bug about the coloring scheme as a blocker of this one). I was thinking more on simply changing "style=rrt" to "style=igor" on a revbump (delaying the other suggested changes for the future). I can do it myself if you wish. As you prefer. Thanks
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6fe3612495ee5a5fa43d567da877d543164922f1 commit 6fe3612495ee5a5fa43d567da877d543164922f1 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-10-18 10:51:02 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-10-18 10:51:56 +0000 sys-apps/less: add 668 As I noted on the bug, upstream had started releasing beta versions after 661 to fix serious regressions -- this is the first such upstream stable release to fix those. We'll stable this version soon. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940096 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-apps/less/Manifest | 1 + sys-apps/less/less-668.ebuild | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
Understood. Let's carry on that discussion in bug 935703 as I have more to say there.
arm done
sparc done
ppc done
arm64 done
x86 done
amd64 done
ppc64 done
hppa done all arches done
