Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 934573 - dev-util/maturin-1.5.1-r1 fails tests on sparc: assertion failed: `(left == right)`
Summary: dev-util/maturin-1.5.1-r1 fails tests on sparc: assertion failed: `(left == r...
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: Sparc64 Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Ionen Wolkens
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: TESTFAILURE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-06-19 20:30 UTC by matoro
Modified: 2024-07-01 00:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log and emerge --info (file_934573.txt,430.71 KB, text/plain)
2024-06-19 20:30 UTC, matoro
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description matoro archtester 2024-06-19 20:30:39 UTC
Created attachment 896118 [details]
build.log and emerge --info

Unfortunately NOT a strictly big-endian issue, as it passes on ppc64.  Reproducible.

failures:

---- build_context::test::test_macosx_deployment_target stdout ----
thread 'build_context::test::test_macosx_deployment_target' panicked at src/build_context.rs:1275:9:
assertion failed: `(left == right)`

Diff < left / right > :
 (
     (
         10,
<        7,
>        12,
     ),
     (
         11,
         0,
     ),
 )


note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace


failures:
    build_context::test::test_macosx_deployment_target

test result: FAILED. 44 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 7.64s

error: test failed, to rerun pass `--lib`
Comment 1 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2024-06-19 20:48:46 UTC
Any idea/hint about what this may be about? (I know next to nothing when it comes to sparc).

Does old maturin-1.4.0 still pass? I believe the tests passed on catbus before.

Could also try the new maturin-1.6.0 and skip stable for 1.5.1-r1 if it helps.

Not that the test itself seems very interesting for us so i'd see little harm in skipping it, we mostly care about building packages using the pep517 backend and I don't see ::test_macosx_deployment_target affecting that. Could try building a random package that uses maturin just to be sure it works.
Comment 2 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2024-06-19 21:01:21 UTC
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #1)
> Any idea/hint about what this may be about? (I know next to nothing when it
> comes to sparc).
> 
> Does old maturin-1.4.0 still pass? I believe the tests passed on catbus
> before.
Retried 1.4.0 on amd64 to be sure it still works somewhere and that the test existed:

    test build_context::test::test_macosx_deployment_target ... ok

If 1.4.0 fails, guess it'll either be something different with catbus, or something that went wrong with newer rust (wouldn't be too surprising on sparc). Not much else I think of as suspect. If it passes, then guess it's going to be some new crate.
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 17:52:48 UTC
I'll try 1.4.0.
Comment 4 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 19:55:44 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> I'll try 1.4.0.

1.4.0 fails using rust-1.79.0. If only Rust were slotted...
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 20:10:16 UTC
rust-bin-1.78.0 fails
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 20:23:21 UTC
rust-bin-1.77.1 fails
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 20:36:25 UTC
rust-bin-1.76.0 fails
Comment 8 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 20:48:20 UTC
rust-bin-1.75.0 fails...
Comment 9 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 21:00:21 UTC
rust-bin-1.74.1 fails, not sure if it's worth going back further?
Comment 10 matoro archtester 2024-06-30 21:23:07 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> rust-bin-1.74.1 fails, not sure if it's worth going back further?

No, I don't think so.  Let's just take it to upstream at this point and ask.  I noticed there are rustc version checks nearby to the failing assertion which makes me nervous.
Comment 11 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-30 21:27:36 UTC
tests pass (!) with 1.73.0
Comment 12 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2024-06-30 23:45:07 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> tests pass (!) with 1.73.0
wow, thanks for going back that far -- guess that may potentially be an issue in rust itself then

Well, as far as downstream goes, I don't think this need to block stable (1.4.0 is no better) -- so guess I'll skip the test on sparc.
Comment 13 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2024-06-30 23:50:42 UTC
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #12)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> > tests pass (!) with 1.73.0
> wow, thanks for going back that far -- guess that may potentially be an
> issue in rust itself then
Then again, if there are rust version checks, who knows...
Comment 14 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2024-06-30 23:56:31 UTC
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #13)
> > guess that may potentially be an issue in rust itself then
> Then again, if there are rust version checks, who knows...
Yeah, I just (now) seen the discussion in #gentoo-python -- reposting the link here for reference:

https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/main/src/build_context.rs#L1279-L1280

So I don't suspect rust too much either now.
Comment 15 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2024-07-01 00:33:01 UTC
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6f4e16b5e58cc8fefc98b02ca05f9f8e067effa5

commit 6f4e16b5e58cc8fefc98b02ca05f9f8e067effa5
Author:     Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-07-01 00:10:17 +0000
Commit:     Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2024-07-01 00:32:30 +0000

    dev-util/maturin: skip failing test_macosx_deployment_target on sparc
    
    Been failing since rust-1.74 likely due to how it does something
    different for >=1.74, and then there is no reason for this to block
    stable given 1.4.0 is affected as well. Plus that a macosx deploy test
    fails seems unlikely to affect building revdeps with the pep517 backend
    (seems unlikely anyone uses it for more than that on sparc).
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/934573
    Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>

 dev-util/maturin/maturin-1.6.0.ebuild | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)