Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 934156 - net-misc/bfgminer: removal
Summary: net-misc/bfgminer: removal
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Deadline: 2024-07-12
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PMASKED
Depends on:
Blocks: 636422
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2024-06-12 18:00 UTC by Arthur Zamarin
Modified: 2024-06-14 14:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arthur Zamarin archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-06-12 18:00:02 UTC 
EAPI=6, maintainer needed, no reverse depdendencies. Not maintained in
gentoo for a long time.

package list:
net-misc/bfgminer
Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2024-06-12 18:03:09 UTC 
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6694b041d63b36f4620c7158c5d2fc7113fc10e9

commit 6694b041d63b36f4620c7158c5d2fc7113fc10e9
Author:     Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-06-12 18:01:01 +0000
Commit:     Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2024-06-12 18:01:20 +0000

    net-misc/bfgminer: last-rite
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/934156
    Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>

 profiles/package.mask | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Comment 2 Luke-Jr 2024-06-12 18:12:51 UTC 
It's still maintained. Not sure why mgorny removed the metadata...
Comment 3 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2024-06-12 18:46:04 UTC 
You haven't touched the package in 2.5 years, regardless of what is in metadata.xml.
Comment 4 Luke-Jr 2024-06-12 19:20:34 UTC 
It hasn't required any touching. The software is stable.
Comment 5 Eli Schwartz 2024-06-14 06:10:51 UTC 
You haven't touched *any* packages in 2.5 years AFAICT.

And the fact that this package uses EAPI 6 is a pretty clear indicator that it needed touching...
Comment 6 Luke-Jr 2024-06-14 14:54:39 UTC 
Nope, still works fine... idk why you're so desperate to delete packages for no reason.