Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 931674 - sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2 fails with IndexError: list index out of range
Summary: sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2 fails with IndexError: list index out of range
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Related Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 931738 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-05-10 13:59 UTC by simon
Modified: 2024-05-11 15:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build log of sci-libs:rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2:20240510-114601.log (rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2.buildlog.txt,71.68 KB, text/plain)
2024-05-10 14:00 UTC, simon
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description simon 2024-05-10 13:59:03 UTC
trying to build rocblas with AMDGPU_TARGETS="gfx1010" fails with an index error using TensileCreateLibrary (attached build log)

It might be that this is not supported on that GPU
https://github.com/ROCm/rocBLAS/issues/1356
https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/install-on-linux/en/latest/reference/system-requirements.html

but then i'd suggest to remove the gfx1010 from the list of the ebuild, if possible?

if my understanding is wrong. Any hints what i might be doing wrong or how i can help here.




Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. unmask and emerge rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2 (as dependency from miopen)
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
emerge fails

Expected Results:  
package builds
Comment 1 simon 2024-05-10 14:00:32 UTC
Created attachment 892662 [details]
build log of sci-libs:rocBLAS-5.7.1-r2:20240510-114601.log
Comment 2 Paul Zander 2024-05-10 15:32:15 UTC
Looking at the linked ROCm issues you might have to wait for the ROCm 6.1 PR to be merged or go back to <5.3 (read 5.1.4)
Comment 3 Paul Zander 2024-05-11 15:08:31 UTC
*** Bug 931738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***