https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ Issue: media-libs/kimageannotator-0.7.0-r1 fails tests. Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci) Info about the issue: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox/Common_Issues_Helper#CF0015
Created attachment 886135 [details] build.log.xz build log and emerge --info (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)
Created attachment 886136 [details] 1-LastTest.log 1-LastTest.log
Alexxy filed that upstream issue meanwhile. @David: We want to move away from virtualx where possible so let's wait for upstream's input on the matter.
The patch upstream fixes the error.
@Paolo Yep, I'm aware (I submitted it), and it will be included in kimageannotator-0.7.1.ebuild. I do appreciate the heads-up though, and thanks for the reminder that I forgot to link this bug to get automatically closed when the pull-request is done. Best regards.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ab03eff9efbb6f1899898954ac8c892745fb2fe0 commit ab03eff9efbb6f1899898954ac8c892745fb2fe0 Author: David Flogeras <dflogeras2@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2024-03-08 15:50:23 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-03-10 16:50:45 +0000 media-libs/kimageannotator: add 0.7.1 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/921699 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/925642 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35670 Signed-off-by: David Flogeras <dflogeras2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> media-libs/kimageannotator/Manifest | 1 + ...ageannotator-0.7.1-fix_KeyInputHelperTest.patch | 32 ++++++++++++++ .../kimageannotator/kimageannotator-0.7.1.ebuild | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
(In reply to David Flogeras from comment #5) > @Paolo > > Yep, I'm aware (I submitted it), and it will be included in > kimageannotator-0.7.1.ebuild. I do appreciate the heads-up though, and > thanks for the reminder that I forgot to link this bug to get automatically > closed when the pull-request is done. > > Best regards. Ops, sorry. I didn't realize it. :-(