This is not actually a bug report. I'm here to report that this package actually compiles surprisingly smoothly with sci-libs/openblas. If later on the author decides to add support for OpenBLAS, there would be almost no technical blocker. My modification of ebuild files ``` mycmakeargs+=(-DBLAS=OpenBLAS) ``` My OpenBLAS setup: (emerge --info openblas) ``` sci-libs/openblas-0.3.23::gentoo was built with the following: USE="eselect-ldso index-64bit openmp -dynamic -pthread (-relapack) -test" ABI_X86="(64)" ...... ``` The configure section of the build.log ``` .......... -- Trying to find preferred BLAS backend of choice: OpenBLAS -- Found OpenBLAS libraries: /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so -- Found OpenBLAS include: /usr/include .......... -- ******** Summary ******** -- General: .......... -- USE_BLAS : 1 -- BLAS : open -- BLAS_HAS_SBGEMM : ........... ``` Also, thank you for this amazing work. Reproducible: Always
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=49f65bf6621d8661f608fe3765a90417f53e23fd commit 49f65bf6621d8661f608fe3765a90417f53e23fd Author: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-02-17 22:20:47 +0000 Commit: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-02-17 22:21:35 +0000 sci-libs/caffe2: allow use of openblas Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923455 Signed-off-by: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> sci-libs/caffe2/{caffe2-2.1.2-r3.ebuild => caffe2-2.1.2-r4.ebuild} | 5 ++++- sci-libs/caffe2/metadata.xml | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
