Thanks! The main fix here compared to last stable is probably bug 921089 which looks frightening to users.
ppc64 done
sparc done
arm64 done
arm done
amd64 done
x86 done
hppa done
Won't stabilize this for ppc due to bug 923368, pending 3.0.62
(In reply to matoro from comment #8) > Won't stabilize this for ppc due to bug 923368, pending 3.0.62 The failure isn't really a problem at runtime for most people as it's behind a FEATURES flag.
ppc done all arches done
This stable ebuild has been removed in commit: commit ebcda0fcb565efda696a77e3bc6c2ab28fc53158 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Date: Mon Mar 4 11:35:20 2024 +0000 sys-apps/portage: drop versions Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> so now the only stable package version (amd64) is portage-3.0.59-r1, and portage wants to downgrade: [ebuild UD ] sys-apps/portage-3.0.59-r1::gentoo [3.0.61-r1::gentoo] USE="(ipc) native-extensions rsync-verify -apidoc -build -doc -gentoo-dev (-selinux) -test -xattr" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_11 (-pypy3) -python3_10 -python3_12" 1148 KiB is that intentional?
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=15353f6a0fc9579dcccc651e92a5d138b4fe3d99 commit 15353f6a0fc9579dcccc651e92a5d138b4fe3d99 Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-03-04 20:11:07 +0000 Commit: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-03-04 20:15:11 +0000 sys-apps/portage: restore 3.0.61-r1 Fixes: ebcda0fcb565 ("sys-apps/portage: drop versions") Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/921933#c11 Signed-off-by: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> sys-apps/portage/Manifest | 1 + sys-apps/portage/portage-3.0.61-r1.ebuild | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
Thank you!