Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 920684 - media-gfx/imagemagick-7.1.1.22 fails to compile (GCC-14-SYSTEM): Failed running autoconf!
Summary: media-gfx/imagemagick-7.1.1.22 fails to compile (GCC-14-SYSTEM): Failed runni...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Codec Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 893434
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2023-12-25 09:14 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2024-01-02 05:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,41.89 KB, text/plain)
2023-12-25 09:14 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details
1-autoconf.out (1-autoconf.out,1.06 KB, text/plain)
2023-12-25 09:14 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-12-25 09:14:10 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: media-gfx/imagemagick-7.1.1.22 fails to compile (GCC-14-SYSTEM).
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: gcc14_tinderbox)

NOTE:
(GCC-14-SYSTEM) in the summary means that the bug was found on a machine that runs gcc-14 but this bug MAY or MAY NOT BE related to the new compiler
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-12-25 09:14:12 UTC
Created attachment 880295 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-12-25 09:14:12 UTC
Created attachment 880296 [details]
1-autoconf.out

1-autoconf.out
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-12-25 09:14:13 UTC
Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary:


 *   Failed running 'autoconf'!
 * Failed running 'autoconf'!
Comment 4 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-25 09:17:08 UTC
./lib/autoconf/c.m4:1676: AC_PROG_GCC_TRADITIONAL is expanded from...
configure.ac:932: the top level
configure:11706: error: possibly undefined macro: _AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_MACRO_VALUE
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.
Comment 6 some guy 2023-12-27 21:43:57 UTC
i have the same problem
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-27 21:44:39 UTC
(In reply to some guy from comment #6)
> i have the same problem

Yeah, I've fixed it upstream already, I'll pull the fix in shortly.
Comment 8 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2023-12-27 22:22:32 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8ec87ded9b4e59132694ac31b0547c01cc418fd5

commit 8ec87ded9b4e59132694ac31b0547c01cc418fd5
Author:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-12-27 22:15:58 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2023-12-27 22:22:20 +0000

    media-gfx/imagemagick: add 7.1.1.24
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920684
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 media-gfx/imagemagick/Manifest                    |   1 +
 media-gfx/imagemagick/imagemagick-7.1.1.24.ebuild | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 253 insertions(+)

Additionally, it has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ddf993fbed863d7ee3310752a8b230910e14f5a1

commit ddf993fbed863d7ee3310752a8b230910e14f5a1
Author:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-12-27 22:10:11 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2023-12-27 22:22:19 +0000

    media-gfx/imagemagick: add 6.9.13.2
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920684
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 media-gfx/imagemagick/Manifest                    |   1 +
 media-gfx/imagemagick/imagemagick-6.9.13.2.ebuild | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
Comment 9 some guy 2023-12-28 09:34:28 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> (In reply to some guy from comment #6)
> > i have the same problem
> 
> Yeah, I've fixed it upstream already, I'll pull the fix in shortly.

thanks