Created attachment 872073 [details] build.log Caught on multiple devboxes. MIght be wrong configuration of container, so keep in mind. > ++ '[' -z yes ']' > ++ case "$1" in > ++ return 0 > ++ hash tput > +++ tput cuu1 > tput: No value for $TERM and no -T specified > +++ tput cuf 72 > tput: No value for $TERM and no -T specified > ++ ENDCOL= > make: *** [Makefile:7: check] Error 2
Looks like it's failing inside gentoo-functions. Does it pass with gentoo-functions-9999?
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Looks like it's failing inside gentoo-functions. Does it pass with > gentoo-functions-9999? It passes now, but I'm unsure if it was the real fix? The tattoo cluster runs this all in a systemd service run, so maybe it just doesn't have any $TERM defined. I don't think I can test it well without polluting stuff, so unsure. When running the test suite directly using `ebuild ... test` or `tatt -b ...` it works even with <gentoo-functions-9999, so I guess this is indeed tattoo making life hard.
(In reply to Arthur Zamarin from comment #2) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > > Looks like it's failing inside gentoo-functions. Does it pass with > > gentoo-functions-9999? > > It passes now, but I'm unsure if it was the real fix? > > The tattoo cluster runs this all in a systemd service run, so maybe it just > doesn't have any $TERM defined. I don't think I can test it well without > polluting stuff, so unsure. > > When running the test suite directly using `ebuild ... test` or `tatt -b > ...` it works even with <gentoo-functions-9999, so I guess this is indeed > tattoo making life hard. Well, a relatively easy fix is not to use gentoo-functions if TERM is not defined. That said, IMHO the bug is in gentoo-functions (which should catch this case).
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=89384561bdab75c3719d1cd1794d2e244451cb34 commit 89384561bdab75c3719d1cd1794d2e244451cb34 Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-10-03 13:53:28 +0000 Commit: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-10-03 13:53:51 +0000 app-portage/getuto: drop 1.6, 1.7 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/915097 Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> app-portage/getuto/Manifest | 2 -- app-portage/getuto/getuto-1.6.ebuild | 50 ------------------------------------ app-portage/getuto/getuto-1.7.ebuild | 50 ------------------------------------ 3 files changed, 102 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=cc1dc8c57247b242fca2733e854fd45c52bc126a commit cc1dc8c57247b242fca2733e854fd45c52bc126a Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-10-03 13:53:09 +0000 Commit: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-10-03 13:53:48 +0000 app-portage/getuto: add 1.9 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/915097 Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> app-portage/getuto/Manifest | 1 + app-portage/getuto/getuto-1.9.ebuild | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
