https://github.com/thkukuk/libnsl/blob/master/src/yp_xdr.c is BSD Reproducible: Always
To my best knowledge the aggregate of a LGPL-2.1+ and a BSD work falls under LGPL-2.1+ (the less permissive license).
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=bc0374db2bf2402b9d6f583719efdaabe9d6e2cb commit bc0374db2bf2402b9d6f583719efdaabe9d6e2cb Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-08-20 20:27:45 +0000 Commit: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-08-20 20:28:08 +0000 net-libs/libnsl: update LICENSE Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/912413 Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> net-libs/libnsl/libnsl-1.3.0-r2.ebuild | 4 ++-- net-libs/libnsl/libnsl-2.0.0-r1.ebuild | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #1) > To my best knowledge the aggregate of a LGPL-2.1+ and a BSD work falls under > LGPL-2.1+ (the less permissive license). I wouldn't dare to decide if that would be universally fine and how that would work with the plethora of used licenses some packages have...
(In reply to steffen_brauer from comment #3) > (In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #1) > > To my best knowledge the aggregate of a LGPL-2.1+ and a BSD work falls under > > LGPL-2.1+ (the less permissive license). > > I wouldn't dare to decide if that would be universally fine and how that > would work with the plethora of used licenses some packages have... (We discussed it on IRC and agreed we should really list things literally, which is why it got fixed after.)
