Bug 911784 – KDE Frameworks 5.109.0 re-keywordreq and sys-power/switcheroo-control-2.6-r2 keywording

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Andreas Sturmlechner 2023-08-05 19:46:18 UTC]

>=kde-frameworks/kio-5.109.0 will depend on sys-power/switcheroo-control, but it is keyworded for many more arches. Would there be any reason not to keyword sys-power/switcheroo-control for these too?

[Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow 2023-08-06 09:08:18 UTC]

The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5ba5b27a9de852662941e12827ef5b69a52482e1

commit 5ba5b27a9de852662941e12827ef5b69a52482e1
Author:     WANG Xuerui <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2023-08-06 09:08:10 +0000
Commit:     WANG Xuerui <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2023-08-06 09:08:10 +0000

    sys-power/switcheroo-control: keyword 2.6-r2 for ~loong
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/911784
    Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <[e-mail]>

 sys-power/switcheroo-control/switcheroo-control-2.6-r2.ebuild | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

[Comment 2 WANG Xuerui 2023-08-06 09:08:37 UTC]

loong done

[Comment 3 Sam James 2023-08-06 11:29:17 UTC]

arm done

[Comment 4 Sam James 2023-08-06 11:29:18 UTC]

arm64 done

[Comment 5 Jakov Smolić 2023-08-10 07:29:18 UTC]

riscv done

[Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner 2023-08-16 13:25:45 UTC]

pacho, one more problem:

In profiles/features/musl/package.mask:
> # systemd doesn't work on musl and upstream aren't interested
> # in supporting it.
> sys-power/switcheroo-control

How is systemd involved here, and is this still relevant?

[Comment 7 Andreas Sturmlechner 2023-08-16 18:59:58 UTC]

Sam, you added it in commit fb1154782d75f3996fbdfa766ad1c0ed09ba7001 but it seems to me this would be no longer accurate as of commit 05c2d14051f6814adc367615b155dd58c46fcc36

[Comment 8 Larry the Git Cow 2023-08-18 08:26:01 UTC]

The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=960c84be96d5478975a5b560ba81b171036f7b26

commit 960c84be96d5478975a5b560ba81b171036f7b26
Author:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2023-08-18 08:07:12 +0000
Commit:     Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2023-08-18 08:25:53 +0000

    profiles: musl: Drop sys-power/switcheroo-control package.mask
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/888199
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/911784
    Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>

 profiles/features/musl/package.mask | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

[Comment 9 Sam James 2023-08-18 08:33:13 UTC]

(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #7)
> Sam, you added it in commit fb1154782d75f3996fbdfa766ad1c0ed09ba7001 but it
> seems to me this would be no longer accurate as of commit
> 05c2d14051f6814adc367615b155dd58c46fcc36

I think in this case it was CI cleaning rather than inspecting the packages in detail, although I think I did actually go on to check some of them later as they looked suspicious.

I think you're right and it's outdated.

[Comment 10 Pacho Ramos 2023-08-23 14:01:42 UTC]

(In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #7)
> > Sam, you added it in commit fb1154782d75f3996fbdfa766ad1c0ed09ba7001 but it
> > seems to me this would be no longer accurate as of commit
> > 05c2d14051f6814adc367615b155dd58c46fcc36
> 
> I think in this case it was CI cleaning rather than inspecting the packages
> in detail, although I think I did actually go on to check some of them later
> as they looked suspicious.
> 
> I think you're right and it's outdated.

Indeed, initially upstream was only testing it on systemd systems and I don't have openRC ones anymore... but, later, some users tested it on openRC setups and we fixed it to also work on them

[Comment 11 Sam James 2023-08-26 04:34:33 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 12 Sam James 2023-08-26 04:34:35 UTC]

x86 done

all arches done