Created an updated version of the ebuild for the 2023-06-19 release of net-fs/mc Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 864442 [details] mc-2023.06.19.19.31.19.ebuild
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=23ce49d1ebf6860f8ccbfeddf25d32008b5e578c commit 23ce49d1ebf6860f8ccbfeddf25d32008b5e578c Author: jinqiang zhang <peeweep@0x0.ee> AuthorDate: 2025-03-16 08:42:22 +0000 Commit: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2025-03-16 10:00:52 +0000 net-fs/mc: add 2025.03.12.17.29.24 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/909028 Signed-off-by: jinqiang zhang <peeweep@0x0.ee> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org> net-fs/mc/Manifest | 2 ++ net-fs/mc/mc-2025.03.12.17.29.24.ebuild | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
@peeweep version 2025.03.12.17.29.24 pushed, but could you take a further step to see if this package is able to coexist with app-misc/mc? thanks
I will rename the /usr/bin/mc to solve it, not sure what name to use yet /usr/bin/mc-cli /usr/bin/mc-go /usr/bin/mc-minio /usr/bin/minio-mc I prefer use /usr/bin/mc-cli .
(In reply to jinqiang zhang from comment #4) > I will rename the /usr/bin/mc to solve it, not sure what name to use yet > > > /usr/bin/mc-cli > /usr/bin/mc-go > /usr/bin/mc-minio > /usr/bin/minio-mc > > I prefer use /usr/bin/mc-cli . I personally incline to make it more app specific rather than too generic, so maybe mc-minio is better? anyway, please investigate more to see if there is better solution and check other file collisions?
