Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 90454 - ppc64 kernel install says to use non existant gentoo-dev-sources
Summary: ppc64 kernel install says to use non existant gentoo-dev-sources
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs-user
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Gentoo Linux PPC Installation Guide (show other bugs)
Hardware: PPC64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Docs Team
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-25 19:35 UTC by Cameron Blackwood
Modified: 2005-04-26 06:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Cameron Blackwood 2005-04-25 19:35:39 UTC
Code Listing 2: Installing a kernel source

# emerge gentoo-dev-sources


where upon I get:

kali init.d # emerge gentoo-dev-sources
Calculating dependencies
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "gentoo-dev-sources".

So I guess the docs are wrong :) :)

Naturally I checked out the kernel docs page and that was even more confusing (which is a seperate bug 90453)


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. read ppc64 kernel install page
2. type emerge gentoo-dev-sources
3. *sigh*

Actual Results:  
emerge failed to find the package.

Expected Results:  
It should have installed a kernel or the docs should have correctly stated to
use gentoo-sources.
Comment 1 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 19:48:20 UTC
the kernel docs page links to the official page at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml, not the gentoo wiki as you stated in bug 90453

word on the street (IRC) says you are right about this, but i don't have comit, so we will have to wait for someone else
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 20:13:16 UTC
fixed the ppc64 handbook, lvm2, ipv6, and gentoo-kernel docs to not refer to 'gentoo-dev-sources' anymore
Comment 3 Alin Dobre (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 22:13:39 UTC
Mike, the gentoo-kernel.xml document shouldn't had been patched. The reference to the gentoo-dev-sources was correct in that context -- the chapter's title is: 'Previously provided kernel packages'. I have commited the reversed changes myself - I have though, bumped the version, as the document's content changed since the last version. hope this is ok.
Comment 4 Cameron Blackwood 2005-04-25 22:20:45 UTC
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml

I cant see any mention of gentoo-dev-sources in that doc.

Unless it's ment to be here.. (which would make more sense)...


4. Previously provided kernel packages

gentoo-sources

gentoo-sources, a 2.6 kernel patched with bug, security and stability fixes, can now be found under the gentoo-sources package.

? So... "gentoo-sources" is "under the gentoo-sources package" :) Maybe the first two gentoo-sources should read gentoo-dev-sources ?
Comment 5 Alin Dobre (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 22:27:37 UTC
Cameron, see my previous comment and wait about an hour until the web nodes syncronize my commit. Now, the paragraph states:
====
gentoo-dev-sources

gentoo-dev-sources, a 2.6 kernel patched with bug, security and stability fixes, can now be found under the gentoo-sources package. 
Comment 6 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-04-26 06:01:48 UTC
my bad, didnt read enough context, was going by grep