Based on the discussion in https://bugs.gentoo.org/876943 I think it would make sense for sys-libs/blocksruntime to have block on dev-libs/libdispatch, it is already there the other way around.
Marek, what's opinion on this one?
Sorry about the delay, somehow this ticket completely eluded my attention. Very much makes sense, I'll push this shortly.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e678177aed8f5be31a8fb35a9a135f9f8f45128c commit e678177aed8f5be31a8fb35a9a135f9f8f45128c Author: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-03-05 21:35:10 +0000 Commit: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-03-05 21:36:45 +0000 sys-libs/blocksruntime: block dev-libs/libdispatch libdispatch bundles the Apple fork of blocksruntime. While at it, trivial EAPI bump. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879919 Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> .../blocksruntime-0_pre20171027-r2.ebuild | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
Awesome, thank you.