Discord is a proprietary application, in this case the distinction of source and binary is the same as for net-im/slack - that is: we assume there is no source, thus binary is kind of like source (I know this makes little sense but I hope you understand what I am trying to say). So maybe we should drop "bin" suffix?
I'm not opposed. However, the suffix was there before I took over maintainership of the package; and the last time I bothered asking on IRC, it seems like we were in agreement that it was a pretty insignificant change and wasn't necessary.
I also would like only to see a -bin suffix, if there could be also a source package. But it's up to the maintainer.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=77c1964aeb0b90312e108072d5bed70fac802a9f commit 77c1964aeb0b90312e108072d5bed70fac802a9f Author: Nick Sarnie <sarnex@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-01-14 15:08:35 +0000 Commit: Nick Sarnie <sarnex@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-01-14 15:11:54 +0000 net-im/discord: rename package Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/877895 Signed-off-by: Nick Sarnie <sarnex@gentoo.org> net-im/{discord-bin => discord}/Manifest | 0 .../discord-bin-0.0.24.ebuild => discord/discord-0.0.24.ebuild} | 0 net-im/{discord-bin => discord}/metadata.xml | 0 profiles/features/musl/package.mask | 2 +- profiles/updates/1Q-2023 | 1 + 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
